摘要
于欢案和昆山案的相继出现使正当防卫制度再次活跃在大众的面前,激发了民众与不法侵害作斗争的维权意识。随着最高人民检察院发布于海明正当防卫案(昆山案)等指导案例用以明确正当防卫界限标准,可以窥见正当防卫制度正随着有关个案的不断发生而有效地被激活。本文通过对近十年以来浙江法院司法实践中相关712份判例的实证调研来观测正当防卫的适用问题,发现有对不法侵害的认识偏差、对防卫不适时的裁判争议较大等特点。为破解该现实困境,本文结合地方司法实践和比较法中有关正当防卫制度的适用,期待正当防卫制度能够被进一步激活。
The successive appearances of the Yu Huan case and the Kunshan case make the legitimate defense system active again in front of the public,which stimulates the public’s awareness of defending their rights in the struggle against illegal violations.With the guidance issued by the Supreme Prosecution in the Haiming Justifiable Defense case to clarify the standard of justifiable defense,it can be seen that the justifiable defense system is being effectively activated as the relevant cases continue to occur.This paper observes the application of legitimate defense through empirical investigation of 712 jurisprudence in the judicial practice of Zhejiang courts in the past ten years.It finds that there are characteristics such as misunderstanding of illegal infringement and large disputes in adjudication when defense is not appropriate.In order to solve this dilemma,this article combines the application of the legitimate defense system in local judicial practice and comparative law,and looks forward to the further activation of the legitimate defense system.
作者
袁继红
赵一鸣
Yuan Jihong;Zhao Yiming
出处
《光华法学》
2020年第1期145-160,共16页
Guanghua Law Review
关键词
裁判文书
正当防卫
司法异化
防卫限度
referee documents
legitimate defense
judicial alienation
defense limits
