摘要
认罪认罚从宽制度在提高办案效率的同时,也暴露出一些问题。从2020年4月热议的北京"余某平"案反思,法院如何妥善处理量刑建议成为当下亟须关注的问题。对此,首先,有必要从实证的角度考察被告人上诉、检察机关抗诉、二审法院改判和发回重审等具体问题。首先,在规范层面,虽然《刑事诉讼法》第201条规定法院"一般应当"采纳量刑建议,但不意味着量刑建议对法院具有强制约束力。其次,法院对量刑建议的审查应是实质审查而非形式审查。再次,法院应采取一种"保守"的立场分情况决定是否采纳量刑建议。最后,当前迫切需要加强法检之间的量刑协调机制,联合制定量刑细则。
The leniency system for guilty pleas and punishments not only improves the efficiency of case handling,but also exposes some problems.Reflecting on the Beijing"Yu Jinping"case that was hotly discussed in April 2020,how the court properly handles sentencing recommendations has become an issue that needs urgent attention at the moment.In this regard,it is necessary to examine specific issues such as the defendant's appeal,the prosecution's protest,the second-instance court's revision and remand for retrial from an empirical point of view.First,at the normative level,although Article 201 of the Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that the court"generally should"adopt sentencing recommendations,it does not mean that sentencing recommendations are mandatory for the court.Second,the court's review of sentencing recommendations should be a substantive review rather than a formal review.Third,the court should adopt a"conservative"position to decide whether to adopt sentencing recommendations based on circumstances.Finally,there is an urgent need to strengthen the sentencing coordination mechanism between law enforcement agencies and jointly formulate sentencing rules.
作者
德格县人民法院课题组
Dege County People's Court Research Group
出处
《光华法学》
2021年第1期189-206,共18页
Guanghua Law Review
关键词
认罪认罚
二审
量刑裁判
量刑建议
Plead Guilty and Punished
Second Instance
Sentencing Referee
Sentencing Suggestion
