期刊文献+

无保护会阴助产技术在初产妇中的应用效果分析

Analysis of application effect of unprotected perineum midwifery in primipara
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析评价初产妇中应用无保护会阴助产技术的效果。方法以在我院产科进行分娩的初产妇作为研究主体,共挑选出88例,均为自然分娩,然后将产妇以随机数字分配方法划分为对照组与研究组,且分别给予这两组常规方法分娩和无保护会阴助产技术分娩,评价两组分娩技术的应用效果。结果相较对照组,观察组产妇的会阴侧切率、新生儿窒息率更低,产后疼痛评分、并发症率更低,产后出血量更少,住院时间更短,组间对比P<0.05,差异显著。结论在初产妇分娩中应用无保护会阴助产技术的临床效果好,极大程度上可降低分娩的疼痛感,值得临床借鉴。 Objective To analyze and evaluate the effect of unprotected perineum midwifery in primipara.Methods 88 primiparas who gave birth in the obstetrics department of our hospital were selected as the research subjects,and all of them gave birth naturally.Then,the parturients were randomly divided into the control group and the research group,and the two groups were given conventional delivery and unprotected perineal midwifery respectively,and the application effect of the two groups of delivery techniques was evaluated.Results Compared with the control group,the observation group had lower perineal incision rate,neonatal asphyxia rate,lower postpartum pain score,lower complication rate,less postpartum hemorrhage and shorter hospital stay,with significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of unprotected perineum midwifery technology in primipara delivery has a good clinical effect,which can greatly reduce the pain of delivery,and is worthy of clinical reference.
作者 高歌 Gao Ge(Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Jiaozuo City,Jiaozuo Henan 454000,China)
出处 《保健医学研究与实践》 2021年第S01期274-276,共3页 Health Medicine Research and Practice
关键词 无保护会阴 助产技术 初产妇 分娩疗效 Unprotected perineum Midwifery technology Primipara Delivery effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献66

  • 1李小毛,沈宏伟,李大慈.产钳术失败8例分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,1996,12(3):179-180. 被引量:22
  • 2王炳顺,周利锋,高尔生,朱丽萍,高晓玲.产妇产后对分娩方式的再认识[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(20):2784-2787. 被引量:32
  • 3[美]F.Gary Cunningham,郎景和译.威廉姆斯产科学[M].第20版.西安:世界图书出版公司,2001:403-405. 被引量:1
  • 4乐杰.妇产科学[M].第8版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.97-106. 被引量:4
  • 5万里,张时鸿,姚建蓉.降低会阴侧切率的技巧[A].青岛:全国妇产科新技术、新理论进展研讨会论文汇编[C].北京:中华护理学会,2012:346-348. 被引量:2
  • 6Graham ID, Carroli G, Davies C, et al. Episiotomy rates around the world: an upate[J]. Birth, 2005, 32(3): 219-223. 被引量:1
  • 7Berghella V,Baxter JK,Chauhan SP,et al. Evidence-based labor and delivery management[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2008,199 (5) :445-454. 被引量:1
  • 8McKinnie V,Swift SE ,Wang W. The effect of pregnancy and mode of delivery on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2005,193:512-517. 被引量:1
  • 9Frankman EA,Wang L,Bunker CH,et al. Episiotomy in the United States:has anything changed? [J]. Am J Obstet Gyneeol, 2009,200 (5) : 5731-5737. 被引量:1
  • 10McCandlish R,Bowler U,van Asten H,et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour[J].Brit J Obstet Gynaec,1998,105(12) : 1262-1272. 被引量:1

共引文献197

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部