期刊文献+

高校课堂教学学生评教结果分析研究——以G大学2017-2018学年为例 被引量:1

Analyses and Researches of Class Teaching and Results of Students’ Instructional Evaluation——Based on Guniversity’ 2017-2018 school year
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用文献研究、问卷研究、统计分析的研究方法,分析G大学2017-2018学年课堂教学学生评教结果。结果表明,在定量评价方面,该校学生对教师授课质量总体评价较高,学生对教师工作非常认可;与全校平均分情况对比,所有开课部门均未发现明显差异,但正高职称教师较高,而初级职称较低。在定性评价方面,较低比例的学生提交评价且文字不多,其中大多数同学们对任课教师给予了褒扬,对部分任课教师在教学上存在的问题提出了意见或建议。本次课堂教学学生评教结果分析工作及其结果为学校评价教学质量,了解教学情况,制定相应政策提供了一定的依据。 Through literature research method,questionnaire method and statistical analysis method,we analyze G university’class teaching and results of Student’s instructional evaluation.On the basis of the finding,several conclusions concerning the results of Student’s instructional evaluation can be drawn.The findings of this study indicated that,for quantitative evaluation,the school has a high overall evaluation on the teaching quality of teachers,and students highly approve of their work;Additionally,compared with the average score of the whole school,no noticeable difference was shown in all the departments of course.However,teachers with higher professional titles are higher.For qualitative evaluation,a small part of the students submit evaluation with little words,and among them most of the students praise teachers.This study can be a reference for schools to evaluating teaching quality,understanding the teaching situation and formulating corresponding policies.
作者 孔祥华 龚莉雅 黎少聪 Kong Xianghua;Gong Liya;Li Shaocong(Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510006,China)
出处 《成都中医药大学学报(教育科学版)》 2020年第1期27-29,共3页 Journal of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine:Educational Science Edition
基金 广州中医药大学2018年校级高等教育教学改革项目“课堂教学督导管理模式的实践与研究”(NO.A3-0433-181-427-027)
关键词 课堂教学 学生 评教 分析研究 Classroom teaching Student Instructional evaluation Investigation and analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献5

共引文献4

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部