摘要
尽管梅洛·庞蒂、萨特、德里达等人所代表的现象学马克思主义试图运用现象学的概念、范畴和方法重新审视20世纪的马克思主义"危机",但他们并没有花费精力探究马克思著作本身在先就具有的现象学意蕴。意大利现象学家恩佐·帕奇在《科学的功能和人的意义》中明确指出,马克思在《资本论》中对政治经济学和自然主义态度的批判所运用的方法实际上是一种现象学方法,并且正是由于马克思自觉地对现象学方法的运用支撑了他对异化和商品拜物教的批判,正是由于马克思著作中表现出来的现象学态度支撑了他对资本主义发展的去神秘化活动、支撑了他对政治经济学抽象范畴的去自然化。
The Phenomenological Marxism represented by MerleauPonty,Sartre and others attempted to re-examine Marxism with the concepts,categories,and methods of Phenomenology.Yet,although they reconsidered Marxism phenomenologically,far less effort was expended in exploring the explicitly phenomenological dimensions of Marx’s own thought.Under the guidance of Italian Phenomenological Marxist Enzo Paci,we try to reinterpret Marx’s Capital.We will find that the phenomenological elements not only pre-existed in Capital,but also those phenomenological elements supported his critique of alienation,commodity fetishism and political economy.
出处
《当代国外马克思主义评论》
2020年第1期235-249,共15页
Contemporary Marxism Review
