摘要
在"帝国"系列中,哈特与奈格里试图对当代资本主义社会做"生命政治批判"。生命政治无疑是贯穿哈特与奈格里理论体系的关键词,也是理解其对马克思思想的继承与发展的重要线索。一方面,哈特与奈格里基于福柯对生命政治的讨论形成了他们对生命政治的独特理解;另一方面,生命政治批判的许多理论内容和方法直接来自于马克思。哈特与奈格里指认生命政治生产为当代资本主义社会的主导性生产形式,由此迈出了从政治经济学批判到生命政治批判的关键一步。值得注意的是,从政治经济学批判到生命政治批判的转换并不意味着断裂,这二者之间事实上存在着不可割裂的继承性关系。通过引入福柯关于政治经济学和生命政治的讨论并以之为中介,可以得出以下结论,以生命政治生产为核心的生命政治批判在源头上可以直接追溯到马克思,并且在政治经济学批判当中已经具有生命政治的萌芽。
In the"Empire"series,what Hardt and Negri try to do is developing a biopolitical critique to contemporary capitalist society.Therefore,the keyword of their critique is definitely"Biopolitics,"which is also a crucial clue to understand their inheritance and development of Marx’s thought.On the one hand,based on Foucault’s thought of biopolitics,Hardt and Negri build up their specific understanding of biopolitics.On the other hand,lots of arguments of biopolitical critique come precisely from the critique of political economy.Identifying biopolitical production as the hegemonic paradigm of contemporary capitalist production,Hardt and Negri accomplish the development from the critique of political economy to the biopolitical critique.However,such a transition does not mean a significant rupture in the relation between the critique of political economy and biopolitical critique.On the contrary,it only implies the lasting relationship between them.Moreover,if we take account of Foucault’s discussion about political economy and biopolitics and regard it as a media,then we will conclude that the headstream of biopolitical critique centered with biopolitical production can be traced directly to Marx,and there has already been some content of biopolitical critique within the critique of political economy.
出处
《当代国外马克思主义评论》
2020年第1期302-320,共19页
Contemporary Marxism Review
关键词
生命政治批判
政治经济学批判
生命政治生产
马克思
福柯
Biopolitical Critique
Critique of Political Economy
Biopolitical Production
Marx
Foucault
