期刊文献+

刑事案件适用七人合议庭的范围:现状、问题与出路 被引量:3

Research on the Application Scope of the Seven Member Collegial Panel in Criminal Cases:Problems and Solutions
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过综合性实证研究发现,地方法院适用七人合议庭审理的刑事案件数量极少,适用比例极低;适用案件类型分布广泛,但是相对集中;被告人判处刑期分布广泛,重罪案件占比不高,但是除去刑事附带民事公益诉讼案件,七人合议庭适用于重罪案件的比例较高;以法院依职权启动为主,依申请启动的极少,启动受制于法院科层制的约束。主要问题在于:“社会影响重大”条款不合理,适用范围设计未能充分考虑案件繁简分流和陪审员的经验优势,控辩双方的程序救济机制不健全。应当将法定法官原则作为指导原则,重构七人合议庭适用范围,取消“社会影响重大”的判断标准,明确七人合议庭适用于死刑案件以及被告人不认罪的可能判处十年以上有期徒刑、无期徒刑案件。应当排除危害国家安全案件、恐怖活动案件、危害国防利益案件、军人违反职责案件、未成年人刑事案件。 Through the comprehensive empirical research method,this paper studies the application of the seven member collegial panel in criminal cases(hereinafter referred to as the“seven member collegial panel”)in the three years after the implementation of the Law on People’s Assessors.Research findings:The number of criminal cases tried by the seven member collegial panel in China is very small,and the application proportion is very low;The types of cases tried by the seven member collegial panel are widely distributed,but they are relatively concentrated.The sentences imposed on the defendants are widely distributed,and the proportion of felony cases is not high.However,excluding cases of criminal incidental civil public interest litigation,the seven member collegial panel applies to felony cases in a high proportion.The collegial panel’s start-up is dominated by the court’s functions and powers,which is rarely start-up on application,and the start-up is subject to the constraints of the court bureaucracy.There are many problems in the scope of application.Firstly,the“significant social impact”clause is unreasonable.Secondly,the design of the scope of application failed to fully consider the complicated and simple diversion of cases and the experience advantages of the the people’s assessor.Thirdly,the procedural relief mechanism of the prosecution and the defense is not perfect.We must take the principle of judges appointed by the law as the guiding principle,reconstruct the scope of application of the seven member collegial panel,abolish the judgment standard of“significant social impact”,and make it clear that the seven member collegial panel is applicable to death penalty cases and cases in which the defendant may be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years or life imprisonment if he does not plead guilty.At the same time,we should exclude cases endangering the state security,terrorist activities,endangering interests of national defense,the serviceman’s violation of duty
作者 禹得水 YU Deshui(Shapingba District People’s Court in Chongqing)
出处 《法学家》 北大核心 2023年第4期102-116,193-194,共17页 The Jurist
关键词 七人合议庭 人民陪审员 社会影响重大 法定法官原则 Seven Member Collegial Panel People’s Accessor Significant Social Impact Principle of Judges Appointed by the Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1施鹏鹏著..陪审制研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:240.
  • 2王爱立..《中华人民共和国人民陪审员法》释义[M].北京:中国民主法制出版社,2018:318.
  • 3最高人民法院政治部..《中华人民共和国人民陪审员法》 条文理解与适用[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2018:422.
  • 4孙长永..中国刑事诉讼法制四十年 回顾、反思与展望[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2021.
  • 5黄琪.新一轮司法改革中刑诉陪审员参审范围之重构——基于基层实践背离和改革方案弊端而论[J].广东行政学院学报,2017,29(1):64-70. 被引量:2
  • 6李昌林著..民众参与刑事审判比较研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2007:362.

二级参考文献1

共引文献1

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部