摘要
有关不可罚的事后行为研究,应当转换为事后犯罪行为的处罚必要性考量。是否处罚事后犯罪行为的问题实质是解决“不典型”数罪的刑事责任分配。首先,需要将事后犯罪行为处罚结果区分为应然规范结果与实际评价结果。刑法的目的是惩罚犯罪,保护公共秩序和人民利益。只要行为人实施了犯罪,从应然规范结果而言,即应根据刑法规定进行惩处。但是,在实际评价结果上,是否处罚事后犯罪行为,需要考察前后数个犯罪是否服务于整体的犯罪目的、所侵犯的法益是否具有牵涉性、追究刑事责任是否具有必要性三个方面。
The research on the theory of the afterwards act of impunity should be transformed into the consideration of the necessity of giving criminal sanctions.The heart of the matter whether to punish the afterwards act is to solve the criminal liability bearing in"atypical plural crimes".First of all,it is necessary to distinguish the criminal punishment of the after-crime offences into the Sollen result and the Isness one.The purpose of criminal law is to punishing crimes,protecting public order and people’s interests.As long as the perpetrator has committed a crime,he should be punished in accordance with the legal principle in terms of Sollen angle.But from a practical point of view,whether to punish the perpetrator who offended subsequent relevance criminal behaviors bearing all the responsibilities,it is necessary to investigate whether the front-back plural crimes serving a monolithic criminal purpose,whether the infringed legal interests are tied up with each other,and the necessity of give criminal sanction.
出处
《刑法论丛》
2021年第1期352-379,共28页
Criminal Law Review
关键词
事后行为
期待可能性
刑事责任
共同犯罪
after-crime offences
anticipated possibility
criminal liability
joint crime
