摘要
长久以来直接适用法构成冲突法的一大难题。尽管直接适用法制度已经在《中华人民共和国涉外民事关系法律适用法》当中得以确立,但中国直接适用法理论仍有很大的不足,进而影响其在司法实践中的正确适用。根据比较法的实践,通过探讨法国的公序法、英国的超越法、德国的干预规范以及荷兰的优先规则等若干代表性国家的直接适用法理论的形成过程,描述直接适用法制度"欧盟化"的历史发展,为我国直接适用法制度的理论完善提供借鉴和帮助。
For a long time, rules of immediate application constitute one of the most difficult issues in the field of conflict law. Although the institution of rules of immediate application has been established in the Act of the PRC on Application of Law to Foreign-Related Civil Relations, the theory of rules of immediate application of China is not perfect enough, and this is why it is not fully utilized in the juridical practice. According to the practice of comparative law, it explores the formation process of theory of rules of immediate application in a number of representative countries, such as lois de police of France, overriding statutes of United Kingdom, Eingriffsnormen of Germany and voorrangsregels of Netherland, which describes the historical development of "Europeanization" of institution of rules of immediate application, so as to provide a help and lesson to the perfection of the theory of rules of immediate application of China.
出处
《欧洲法律评论》
2019年第1期83-107,共25页
Chinese Journal of European Law
关键词
直接适用法
强制规范
欧盟
《罗马条例Ⅰ》
Rules of immediate application
mandatory rules
EU
Rome I Regulation
