摘要
南海仲裁案仲裁庭认定南沙群岛全部地物均为岩礁,其对“岩礁”自然要件的论证过程存在逻辑漏洞,对经济要件的解释内容超出文本应有之义。现今对岩礁条款的解释应当与时俱进,合理的人工建造活动不能改变岩礁的法律地位;“维持人类居住和本身经济生活”无需达到大陆生活水平且允许一定程度的外部支援;“人类居住”和“经济生活”应分开考虑。演进解释下南沙诸岛中有10个地物完全符合岛屿的构成要件,有权主张专属经济区和大陆架。
The Tribunal in the South China Sea Arbitration declared that all the hightide features of Nansha Islands were legally“rocks”that did not generate an exclusive economic zone or continental shelf.In its award,there are logical flaws in its determination of the natural quality and the interpretation of the economic attribute went far beyond what should be meant by the Law of the Sea.In fact,“rock”belongs to generic terms,therefore it should be interpreted by evolutive interpretation.There are ten high-tide features all have the right to claim the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf.
作者
杨晗
YANG Han(School of Law,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China)
出处
《海大法律评论》
2022年第1期367-383,共17页
SMU Law Review
关键词
南海仲裁案
岩礁
演进解释
South China Sea Arbitration
rock
evolutive interpretation
