摘要
本文以中国某派出所的人种志数据为基础,考察了中国警察在三种不同的恢复性司法(RJ)制度下对酌情决定权的运用。参照威尔森(Wilson)的警务组织形式,本文揭示了中国警务中的"看守式""法治式"和"服务式"的混杂性,这有助于从制度上理解警察对调解工作的决策是如何形成的。本文还运用了利普斯基(Lipsky)的基层行政理论,重点关注警察如何选择案件并促进利益相关者之间达成协议。利普斯基定义的应对策略是警察面对繁重工作和疑难案件时所使用的策略。总体而言,恢复性司法在中国主要是作为自上而下的国家改革而推广的;同时,在行政理性和维护社会秩序稳定的催化下,警察酌情决定权既有利于法律中的恢复性司法的分化,也有助于实践中恢复性司法的趋同。
Based on ethnographic data collected from one local police station in China,this article attempts to examine the use of discretion by Chinese police in three different restorative justice(RJ)programs.With reference to Wilson’s organizational style of policing,the hybridity of watch-man,legalistic and service style in Chinese policing is identified,which can help conceptualize how police decision over mediation work has been institutionally co-shaped.This article also deploys Lipsky’s street-level bureaucracy with specific focuses on how the police select cases and facilitate an agreement between stakeholders.Coping strategies defined by Lipsky are found to be employed by the police to confront their huge workload and complicated cases.Overall,RJ in China is primarily promoted as universal top-down national reforms;meanwhile,police discretion,catalyzed by bureaucratic rationalities and the political imperative of social order and stability,is conducive to both the divergence and convergence between RJ in law-books and in action.
出处
《河南警察学院学报》
2021年第4期50-60,共11页
Journal of Henan Police College
