摘要
晚近以来,国内不少学者指责逻辑与历史相一致原则与马克思主义政治经济学的建构方法并不吻合,认为应当对逻辑与历史相一致的观点重新加以反思和批判,其中的根据常见于“内部联系论”与“从后思索论”。本文通过分析认为,逻辑与历史相一致原则,首先在叙述特征上表现为“顺序一致论”,在建构方法上则反映为历史分析与逻辑分析的统一。从叙述特征上看,“内部联系论”与“从后思索论”皆不能作为否证“顺序一致论”的依据;从建构方法上说,历史分析与逻辑分析的统一是辩证唯物主义指导下的建构方法,它是《资本论》中的建构方法,却非《资本论》中唯一的建构方法。借以对“内部联系论”与“从后思索论”的批判性反思,审慎地对待相关理论论调。
In recent years,many domestic scholars have criticized the principle of consistency between logic and history for not being consistent with the construction method of Marxist political economy.They believe that the viewpoint of consistency between logic and history should be reconsidered and criticized,which is commonly based on“internal connection theory”and“post reflection theory”.The article analysis points out that the principle of consistency between logic and history is first manifested in the narrative characteristics as the theory of sequential consistency,and in the construction methods as the unity of historical analysis and logical analysis.From the perspective of narrative characteristics,neither the theory of internal connections nor the theory of retrospective reflection can serve as a basis for refuting the theory of sequential consistency.In terms of construction methods,the unity of historical analysis and logical analysis is a construction method guided by dialectical materialism.It is a construction method in Das Kapital,but not the only construction method used in Das Kapital.The critical reflection on“internal connection theory”and“post reflection theory”needs to be approached with caution.
作者
张鋆
陆红红
Zhang Jun;Lu Honghong
出处
《海派经济学》
2024年第1期17-27,共11页
Journal of Economics of Shanghai School
关键词
逻辑与历史相一致
叙述特征
建构方法
《资本论》
Logic is Consistent with History
Narrative Characteristics
Construction Methods
Das Kapital
