摘要
基于范畴的归纳推理是日常使用概念的重要方面之一。但是与概念哲学和心理学的许多其他领域(如概念学习、概念组合等)相比,其受到的关注甚少。而事实上,在范畴归纳的前提和结论中使用的概念(对象、属性)并不总是明显相关的,由此在哲学、心理学和逻辑学中造成诸多问题。在研究范畴归纳推理的心理过程时,由芮普兹、澳舍森等人建构的模型等都是基于概念原型论来处理范畴相似性和典型性问题但最终都失败了。一种替代性方案是辩护一种概念的多元论哲学,给出比传统模型更为丰富和完整的范畴归纳推理解释。
Category-based induction is an important function of using concepts in everyday life.But unlike many other areas of philosophy and psychology of concepts(such as conceptual learning,conceptual combination,etc.),it has not been paid the attention as it should be.In fact,the concepts(objects,attributes)used from premises to conclusions in category-based inductions are not always clearly related,which causes different problems in philosophy,psychology,and logic.When studying the psychological process of category-based induction,the models demonstrated by Rips and Osherson are based on prototype model that deals with the problem of similarity and typicality and finally fail.One of the solutions is conceptual pluralism that provides a more detailed and comprehensive explanation to category-based induction than traditional models.
作者
郁锋
YU Feng(Department of Philosophy,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第4期9-14,共6页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金
国家社科基金项目“多感官交互的知觉知识论研究”(22BZX099)
关键词
基于范畴的归纳推理
概念多元论
原型论
相似性
典型性
category-based induction
conceptual pluralism
prototype theory
similarity
typicality
