摘要
在对CHARLS数据库的相关文献进行统计分析和热点总结的基础上,应用CiteSpace软件,对韩国、美国和英国的老龄相关数据库及其相关文献研究热点进行可视化分析,并据此总结了国内外四种老龄相关数据库的研究范围和应用领域。结果显示:就样本数据的选取而言,HRS较其余三个数据库更为严谨,ELSA稍显不够完善;而在研究领域方面,KLSoA在研究热点上与HRS较为相近;我国学者对于CHARLS的应用有许多针对我国国情的研究,总体来说CHARLS的国际影响力还有所欠缺。
Through statistical analysis and hotspot summary of pertinent literature in the CHARLS database,and with the help of CiteSpace,this paper conducted a visualized analysis on research hotspots and databases of South Korea,the United States,and the United Kingdom,and then summarized their research scope and fields of application.Results show that,in terms of sample data selection,HRS is the most rigorous of the four and ELSA is not so satisfying.KLSoA is similar to HRS in terms of research hotspots.Chinese scholars have used CHARLS a lot and have done research in accordance with China’s national conditions.Generally speaking,the overall international influence of CHARLS is still lacking.
作者
汪颖
黄泽
WANG Ying;HUANG Ze(School of Art and Design,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou 310018,Zhejiang Province,China;Silk and Fashion Culture Research Center of Zhejiang Province,Hangzhou 310018,Zhejiang Province,China)
出处
《老龄科学研究》
2020年第8期68-79,共12页
Scientific Research on Aging
基金
教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“农村老年人需求分析与精准设计实证研究”(19YJC760099)
“乡村振兴战略背景下农村老龄公共产品需求分析与设计路径研究”(19NDJC232YB)
