摘要
现行突厥早期史(583年以前)的叙述框架,即土门系、室点密系突厥东西并立说,建立在沙畹对诸种语文文献的错误统合之上。突厥早期史史料可分为三个层次:一是同时代形成的文本;二是后世突厥人的历史记忆;三是以《新唐书·西突厥传》为代表的后世史家的重构。史料批判的结果表明,室点密既不是活跃于突厥西部的Silzibul/Sizabul/Sinjibū,也不是征服西域自立为可汗的西突厥汗国始祖;“泥利国书”中与另一位可汗一同击败柔然的室点密形象则相对可靠。对突厥汗国西部早期历史的考察显示,汗国早期政治结构并非东西并立,而是大可汗独尊于上。
The existing mainstay narrative of the early history of the First Türk Khaganate(before 583 AD)—Istami and his descendants controlled its western part while Bum?n and his descendants ruled its eastern part—is based on the material of multilingual fragments erroneously gathered together byé.Chavannes.Sources concerning the early history of the First Türk Khaganate include three parts:(1)contemporary records;(2)recollections of later Türks;(3)reconstructions by later historians,represented by the chapter of Western Türks in the New Book of Tang.A Critical analysis of these sources tells that Istami was not Silzibul/Sizabul/Sinjibūthat was active in the western part of the First Türk Khaganate,nor the founder of the Western Türk Khaganate who proclaimed himself as a Khagan after conquering the western regions.It is relatively reliable that Istami defeated the Rouran Khaganate together with another Khagan,as refl ected in Niri’s letter(Theophylact’s Exkurs on the Türks).The exploration of the early history of the western part of the First Türk Khaganate demonstrates that before 583 AD there was but one Türk Khaganate under the rule of the great Khagan rather than the coexistence of two.
作者
孟楷卓
于子轩
Meng Kaizhuo;Yu Zixuan
出处
《历史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期165-187,224,共24页
Historical Research
