摘要
《穆天子传》在历代学界争议中已经逐渐被揭露出它富于虚构性、创造性的文本特征。《穆传》书中存在脱离西周年代却切合战国史实的内容,不可能为西周史官实录;而战国理性精神的兴起以及《穆传》叙事仅以神话传说作为"神名"使用,可知其中虽有神灵信仰,却并非巫觋之作。结合战国时代背景审视,《穆传》应属于士人的托名附会之作,其作者很可能是魏国士人。此书的创作与战国士人参与政事的风尚紧密相关。
Mu Tianzi Zhuan(Biography of King Mu,briefly Mu Zhuan)has gradually revealed its fictional and creative textual features in the controversies of the academic circles in the past.The content of Mu Zhuan,which is divorced from the Western Zhou Dynasty but conforms to the historical facts of the Warring States Period,cannot be recorded by historians of the Western Zhou Dynasty.The rise of the rational spirit of the Warring States Period and the use of the narrative of Mu Zhuan as a"god name"only depend on the location of mythical characters,and we can see that although there were god beliefs in it,it is not works of wizards.Therefore,this book should belong to the writings of scholars in the Warring States Period,whose creation was closely related to the fashion of scholars participating in politics at that time.
出处
《民俗研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第2期124-130,159-160,共9页
Folklore Studies
关键词
《穆天子传》
创作性质
士人
参政
托名虚构
Mu Tianzi Zhuan
nature of creation
scholars
participation in politics
name-borrowing fictions
