摘要
发端于19世纪浪漫主义的古典芭蕾,至今仍风靡于全球各地歌剧院。本文探讨了芭蕾作为一种全球身体文化,在台前幕后的那些时间、文化资本以及性别的悖论。本文依据源自斯德哥尔摩、伦敦和纽约三家国家芭蕾舞团,以及美因河畔法兰克福的法兰克福当代芭蕾舞团的民族志研究,笔者建议保留古典芭蕾舞种。因为它不仅是一种“高雅”文化,而且是一种身体文化,数百年来一直通过身体传授与培养得以延续发展。在古典浪漫主义芭蕾形成的那段欧洲岁月中,超自然是一种时尚,阶级和文化背景对婚姻选择的影响远胜于今。我们可见芭蕾依旧能通过一些经典母题故事来感动观众,这些母题往往呈现爱与社会结构、准则、欲望和道德的缠结关系。最受欢迎的古典芭蕾舞剧如《天鹅湖》(Swan Lake)、《仙女》(La Sylphide)和《吉赛尔》(Giselle),这类舞剧均在激进的当代版本中遭遇挑战,这确立了古典芭蕾在芭蕾舞界及全社会各领域中的突出地位。文章基于不同地区芭蕾学校的比较民族志研究,旨在揭示芭蕾的一种全球性关联,进而指明芭蕾作为一种样式身体文化的稳固存在。
Set in 19th-century Romanticism,classical ballets are still playing to full opera houses across the globe.This article explores paradoxes of time,cultural capital and gender in ballet as a global physical culture on-and off-stage.Drawing on the ethnography of three national ballet companies in Stockholm,London and New York and a contemporary company in Frankfurt-am-Main,I suggest that classical ballet is preserved because it is not only a‘high’culture,but also a physical culture which has been taught and cultivated between bodies for centuries.Scrutinizing the stories of the Romantic ballets that originated during an era in Europe when the supernatural wasàla mode and class and cultural background had a greater impact on marriage choice than today,we note that ballets still have the ability to touch audiences through the archetypical themes of love in relation to social structure and norms,desire,and morality.The most popular classical ballet productions such as Swan Lake,La Sylphide and Giselle have been challenged in radical contemporary versions which confirm the prominent position of classical ballet both in the ballet world and society at large.Comparative ethnographic work on ballet schools in different locations helps to uncover the global connections that point to the robust existence of ballet as a unitary form of physical culture.
作者
周渝(译)
Helena Wulff;Zhou Yu(Stockholm University,Sweden;不详)
出处
《当代舞蹈艺术研究》
2022年第4期103-112,共10页
Contemporary Dance Research
基金
江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目“基于艺术学立场的艺术民族志理论方法研究”(项目编号:2020SJZDA026)阶段性研究成果
关键词
芭蕾
时间
文化资本
性别
礼仪
规训
全球化
ballet
time
cultural capital
gender
decorum
discipline
globalization