摘要
目的比较商品诱饵诱蝇王与传统的糖醋诱饵和腐鱼诱饵监测蝇类密度的差异。方法捕蝇笼诱捕法。结果采用诱蝇王诱饵平均蝇密度为15.11只/笼,采用腐鱼诱饵平均蝇密度为54.33只/笼,采用糖醋诱饵平均蝇密度为4.67只/笼,其差异有统计学意义(Hc=46.029,P<0.05)。不同生境引诱数量无统计学差异(Hc=1.942,P>0.05)。诱蝇王诱集的蝇类种类为12种,腐鱼为16种,糖醋为8种。结论诱蝇王可作为捕蝇笼法诱饵用于蝇类密度监测。
Objective To compare the differences of commercial fly bait Youyingwang,traditional sweet and sour bait and rotten fish bait in monitoring the fly density.Methods Flies were captured with fly cages.Results The average densities were 15.11 flies per cage from the Youyingwang bait,54.33 flies per cage from the rotten fish bait and 4.67 flies per cage from the sweet and sour,with statistically significant difference(Hc=7.261,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the numbers of flies captured among the three habitats(Hc=0.695,P>0.05).There were 12 species of flies lured by Youyingwang bait,16 by rotten fish bait and 8 by sweet and sour bait.Conclusion Youyingwang bait can be applied in fly monitoring.
作者
马周理
蔡恩茂
夏仪
MA Zhou-li;CAI En-mao;XIA Yi(Shanghai Changning District Chengjiaqiao Street Community Health Service Center,Shanghai 201103,China;Changning District Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Shangahi 200051,China)
出处
《中华卫生杀虫药械》
CAS
2022年第1期9-11,共3页
Chinese Journal of Hygienic Insecticides and Equipments
关键词
商品诱饵
蝇类
监测
commercial bait
flies
monitoring
