摘要
代理法中的自我行为因其普遍存在着利益冲突,各国法律对自我行为都作出了禁止性规定。自我行为又可分为自己代理和双方代理,我国《民法典》第168条对自己代理和双方代理进行了禁止,但并未规定自我行为的法律效力为何,故我国学界和司法实践对于自我行为的法律效力存在着争议,主要有无效、可撤销及效力待定三种观点。对于法律的解释应以规范条文之文义为出发点,同时通过与其他条文之间的体系解释,探求规范之意旨。《民法典》第168条的规范意旨在于保护本人之利益,防止自我代理行为所存在的利益冲突对本人造成的损害。通过文义、体系、目的三大基本解释要素对我国《民法典》第168条进行解释,可推知自我行为在我国实证法中应采效力待定观点。
Because of the conflict of interests,the self-behavior in the agency law is prohibited by the laws of various countries.Self-behaviors can be divided into self-agent and agents from both sides,China’s General Provisions Civil Law Article 168 of self-agent and agents from both sides are prohibited,but it does not specify the legal effect of self-behavior,so China’s theory and judicial practice for the legal effect of self-behavior is controversial.There are three main viewpoints of invalidity,revocability and effect to be determined.The interpretation of the law should take the text of the normative provisions as the starting point;and at the same time,through the system interpretation between the other provisions;and more importantly,to explore the intention of the norms,article 168 of the General Provisions of Civil Law is intended to protect my interests and prevent the self-agency behavior of the conflict of interest caused to me.By interpreting Article 168 of the General Provisions of Civil Law of our country through the three basic elements of interpretation of meaning,system and purpose,it can be inferred that self-behavior should be effective in our country’s empirical law.
作者
尹涛
邓丽君
YIN Tao;DENG Lijun(Business school,Quanzhou Normal University,Fujian 362000,China;Quanzhou Ocean Institute,Fujian 362000,China)
出处
《泉州师范学院学报》
2021年第1期14-18,共5页
Journal of Quanzhou Normal University
关键词
自我行为
文义解释
体系解释
《民法典》
self-behavior
interpretation of meaning
system interpretation
the General Provisions of Civil Law
