摘要
伊利开创性地提出了"程序性司法审查理论",但若沿其审查思路进行分析,进而抽象出其"程序"之义,将发现在疑难案件中拒斥"界定价值和推行价值"的纯粹程序性审查是不可能的。程序性审查方法虽然存在,在适用中却遭遇最终需诉诸价值的逻辑困境,这在表面上看是由于伊利对"程序类型"和"程序审查标准"的论证不够全面与连贯,但其根源在于他所依赖的实质代表理论无法真正地为他提供一个程序性审查的有效基础。单薄的论证无法带来智识的创获与提升,只有深入伊利的司法审查理论框架并与之对话,方知其"程序性"体现在何处又失败在何地。
Ely put forward the theory of procedural judicial review in a pioneering way,but if it is analyzed along its review line and then abstracts the meaning of its procedure,it will be found that it is impossible to reject the pure procedural review of defining value and implementing value in difficult cases.Although procedural methods exist,but in the applicable difficulties eventually need to resort to the value of logic,which is due to Ely in surface of program type and examination standards of argument is not comprehensive and coherent,but its root cause lies in what he has to rely on the essence of the representative theory fails to provide him with a really effective foundation of procedural review.The weak argumentation can not bring about the creation and improvement of intellectual knowledge.Only by going deep into the theoretical framework of judicial review and having a dialogue with it,can we know where its procedural nature is embodied and where it fails.
作者
李帅
刘亦艾
Li Shuai;Liu Yiai
出处
《人权研究（辑刊）》
2019年第2期76-103,共28页
Journal of Human Rights
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目“财税法视角下司法预算分层保障机制研究”(项目编号:18CFX055)
中央高校基本科研业务费项目华东师范大学人文社会科学青年跨学科创新团队项目(项目编号:2018ECNU-QKT013)的阶段性成果.
关键词
伊利
程序性司法审查
实质代表
司法介入
Ely
Procedural Judicial Review
Virtual Representation
Judicial Intervention
