摘要
随着认罪认罚从宽制度在刑事案件领域的全面推广,检察官量刑建议权对法官裁量权的影响日益增大,司法资源在法、检之间的配置方式也发生了深刻变化。实践中,法官资源不足导致的认罪认罚案件实质性审查难落实、判决书过度借鉴量刑建议书等现象时有发生。为合理配置法官资源,应根据认罪认罚案件的复杂程度,将其划分为“简单”“复杂”和“简单转复杂”等三种类型,并重构法官对案件的审查方式,即:针对“简单”案件,要求检察官提出确定刑量刑建议、法官进行形式审查为原则;针对“复杂”案件,应落实检察官对案件的重点办理和法官对案件的实质性审查;针对“简单转复杂”案件,法官应在形式审查的基础上继续进行实质性审查,还要加强检察官对判决结果的监督。
With the promotion of the leniency system of pleading guilty and accepting punishment,prosecutor's proposal rights have a great impact on judges'judgments,and the allocation of judicial resources between the prosecution and the court is optimized.In practice,judges generally do not conduct substantive examination of cases,and the sentencing recommendations are directly adopted in the judgment.In order to allocate judges'resources reasonably,cases of pleading guilty and accepting punishment should be divided into"simple","complex","simple-to-complex"categories.And the review methods of cases should be reconstructed.For"simple"cases,the prosecutor proposes a definite sentence recommendation,and the judge conducts formal examination,with the aim of saving judicial resources.For"complex"cases,the prosecutor’s key handling of cases and the judge’s substantive examination of cases should be implemented.For"simple-to-complex"cases,the judge should continue to conduct substantial review on the basis of formal review,but attention should also be paid to the prosecutor’s supervision of the judgment result.
出处
《四川警察学院学报》
2023年第6期47-55,共9页
Journal of Sichuan Police College
基金
2023年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题“数字时代个人信息保护检察民事公益诉讼制度研究”(GJ2023D47)
关键词
认罪认罚
量刑建议
裁量权
实质性审查
leniency system of pleading guilty and accepting punishment
sentencing recommendation
discretion
substantive review
