摘要
学术界存在着马克思"近黑格尔"抑或"近康德"的阐释之争。实质上,两种理解方式指涉的是不同的论说语境。超越这一困境需要进一步激活马克思哲学阐释路径的有效方案。如果我们将"近黑格尔"的阐释路径理解为从"哲学思维的沿袭"转向"问题域的承接",便能够清晰地看出,黑格尔对需要体系的论述使得马克思从抽象的个人转向对人的现实需要的考察。在对市民社会的研究中,黑格尔所揭示的劳动与贫困的悖论又为马克思人类解放的构想提供了现实根基;至于如何实现解放,马克思则是在黑格尔主奴辩证法的视野中,重构劳动观念加以达成的。
In the academic circles,there is a controversy over the interpretation about whether"Marx is close to Hegel"or"close to Kant".In essence,such two ways of understanding refer to different contexts of discourse.How to surmount this dilemma is an effective way to further activate the interpretation path of Marxist philosophy.If we interpreted the approach of"close to Hegel"as a transition from"the inheritance of philosophical thinking"to"the inheritance of problem domain",we can clearly see that the exposition of Hegel’s needs system urged Marx to reach a shift from abstract individual to the investigation of human’s realistic needs.In the study of civil society,Hegel’s paradox of labor and poverty offered Marx’s idea of human emancipation a realistic foundation.As for how to achieve emancipation,Marx reconstructed the concept of labor in the perspective of Hegel’s master-slave dialectics.
出处
《思想与文化》
2019年第2期113-123,共11页
Thought & Culture
关键词
黑格尔
马克思
劳动概念
传承关系
Hegel
Marx
concept of labor
relationship of legacy
