摘要
目的评价国内针刺治疗冠心病心绞痛随机对照试验的文献报告质量。方法计算机检索中国知网,维普中文期刊全文数据库,万方数字化期刊群,中国生物医学文献数据库,收集国内针刺治疗冠心病心绞痛的随机对照试验(RCT),应用CONSORT 2010声明和STRICTA清单对纳入文献进行报告质量评价。结果共纳入24篇文献。0篇文献完全符合CONSORT声明或STRICTA标准且各条目报告率参差不齐,其中受试者合格标准、针刺细节及结局指标等报告率较高,而试验设计、样本量估算、盲法、不良反应、试验注册及方案、针刺场所及治疗师背景等方面报告不足。结论目前针刺治疗冠心病心绞痛随机对照试验的报告质量普遍较低。建议研究者加强临床试验方法学的系统学习并严格参照CONSORT声明和STRICTA清单进行临床研究报告,以期提高文献的报告质量。
Objective To assess the quality of domestic randomized controlled trial(RCT)on acupuncture for treating Angina Pectoris.Methods Computers searched China knowledge network,Weipu,Wanfang,and China Biomedical Literature Database to collect randomized controlled trials of acupuncture treatment for angina pectoris at home.Apply CONSORT 2010 and STRICTA to assess the reporting quality of included literatures.Result A total of 24 RCTs were included.There was no document were comformed to the CONSORT statement and the STRICTA standard.In addition,the reporting rate of each item was uneven.Among them,eligibility criteria for participants,acupuncture details and outcome indicators were relatively high,while there were insufficient reports on trial design,sample size estimation,blinding,harms,trial registration and protocol,setting of treatment and practitioner background.Conclusion The reporting quality of acupuncture for Angina Pectoris was generally low at present.It is recommended that researchers must enhance the systematic learning of clinical trial methodology and the clinical trials should be strictly reported according to CONSORT statement and STRICTA to improve the reporting quality of literatures.
作者
陈丽萍
姚俊鹏
陈姣
赵凌
梁繁荣
Chen Liping;Yao Junpeng;Chen Jiao;Zhao Ling;Liang Fanrong(College of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina,Chengdu University of TCM,Chengdu 610075,China)
出处
《世界科学技术-中医药现代化》
CSCD
北大核心
2020年第8期2710-2716,共7页
Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Materia Medica-World Science and Technology
基金
国家自然科学基金委员会重大项目(81590951):穴位敏化现象和规律的临床研究,负责人:梁繁荣
