摘要
正当期待概念源自英美行政法。投资者在国际投资仲裁实践活动中反复诉请正当期待保护,而双边投资协定、区域性贸易协定的投资条款对正当期待尚未予以明文规定。国际投资仲裁庭在文本缺位的情况下诉诸一般法律原则,且在个案中逐步扩大解释投资条约的公平与公正待遇的内涵与外延,从而解读出正当期待的判断标准。东道国政府行为经仲裁庭的类型化分析之后,初步形成了趋同化的正当期待认定规则。
The concept of Legitimate Expectations is derived from Anglo-American administrative law.A lot of investors constantly appeal for the protections of Legitimate Expectation in international investment arbitration actions,the Legitimate Expectations are not stipulated in the investment clauses of bilateral investment agreements and regional trade agreements.The international investment arbitration tribunal resorted to general principles law,gradually expanded the connotation and denotation of Fair and Equitable Treatment,and interpreted the judgement criterions of Legitimate Expectation based on individual cases.The governmental actions of host countries are categorized by arbitration tribunal,there is a convergence trend in the Legitimate Expectation rules.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2021年第1期126-138,共13页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金
国家社科基金项目《国际投资协定发展趋势研究》(批准号:14BFX138)的成果
关键词
公平与公正待遇
国际投资仲裁
正当期待判断规则
Fair and Equitable Treatment
International Investment Arbitration
Rules of Legitimate Expectation
