摘要
通过分析最高人民法院的五个复函,笔者发现中国法院对国际商事仲裁协议司法审查中"超裁"的认定存在如下问题:一是"超裁"的含义不明确;二是部分法院在国际商事仲裁"超裁"司法审查案件中未履行内部请示报告制度;三是司法审查的启动与认定的情形不统一;四是仲裁裁决的可分性存在争议。针对上述问题,建议采取如下措施予以解决:一是明确不予承认与执行国际商事仲裁裁决的"超裁"情形;二是严格落实内部请示报告制度;三是统一司法审查标准,确定审查仲裁标准;四是积极支持国际商事仲裁。
Based on the analysis of the five Supreme People’s Court replies,it is found that there are some problems in the determination of"over-ruling"in the judicial review of international commercial arbitration agreement by Chinese courts;second,some courts fail to implement the internal reporting system in the cases of judicial review of international commercial arbitration;third,the situation of the initiation and determination of judicial review is not unified;fourth,the separability of judicial decisions is controversial.In view of the above-mentioned problems,it is suggested to take the following measures to solve them:first,the situation of"over-adjudication"in which international commercial arbitration awards are explicitly not recognized and enforced;second,the strict implementation of the internal reporting system for request for instructions;and third,the uniform standards of judicial review;fourth,we should actively support international commercial arbitration.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2021年第2期105-117,共13页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
国际商事仲裁
司法审查
超裁
state commercial arbitration
judicial review
overruling
