摘要
在商事仲裁实践中,律师担任仲裁员的现象较为普遍。由具备丰富仲裁实务经验的律师担任仲裁员,有利于争议的高效解决。但是,当律师既以代理人身份为一方当事人提供法律服务,又以仲裁员身份在其他仲裁案件中居中裁断时,常会发生利益冲突。为此,我国司法部先后于2010年与2016年颁布部门规章对律师担任仲裁员的情形进行规制,但是司法实践对此采取的态度并不一致。有法院严格禁止律师在其担任仲裁员的仲裁机构代理案件,而有的法院则采取相对宽松的立场。本文采用实证分析方法,在收集大量案例的基础上,分析法院对律师担任仲裁员问题的司法审查现状,针对其中所暴露出的法律适用不一致、回避标准不清晰等问题,建议通过修改《仲裁法》,增设仲裁员披露义务,统一司法审查标准。
In the practice of commercial arbitration,it is common for lawyers to act as arbitrators.A lawyer with rich arbitration experience as an arbitrator is conducive to the efficient settlement of disputes.However,when a lawyer not only provides legal services for a party as an agent,but also acts as an arbitrator in other arbitration cases,conflicts of interest often occur.For this reason,Ministry of Justice issued departmental regulations in 2010 and 2016 to regulate the situation of lawyers serving as arbitrators,but judicial review practices take different attitudes towards this.Some courts strictly prohibit lawyers from representing as arbitrators,while others take a more lenient stance.On the basis of collecting the vast majority of cases,this article uses the empirical analysis method to analyze the courts’judicial review on the issues where a lawyer acts as an arbitrator.In order to solve the exposed problems such as inconsistent application of laws and unclear recusal standards,this article suggests that the obligation to disclose arbitrators shall be added,the standard of judicial review of such cases shall be unified by revising the arbitration law.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2021年第5期54-77,共24页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金
党的十九届四中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目“我国法域外适用法治体系构建研究”(项目编号:20ZDA031)的阶段性成果
首都经济贸易大学北京市属高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目阶段性成果
关键词
律师
仲裁员
利益冲突
回避
lawyer
arbitrator
conflict of interest
avoidance
