摘要
黄金储备公司诉委内瑞拉案是投资者-国家间争端解决机制下的典型案件,该案件涉及到了如何界定适格投资的管辖权、破坏投资者合理期待是否应被认定为违反公平公正待遇以及公平公正待遇的具体内涵究竟为何等问题。该案仲裁庭将程序问题与实体问题合并审理,在确认其具有管辖权的同时认定被申请人违反了双边投资协定项下的公平公正待遇条款。仲裁庭围绕“投资”的适格判断、投资者合理期待的认定、公平公正待遇的内涵以及标准等争议焦点进行了分析,对后续国际投资仲裁实践具有重要的参考意义。随着国际投资实践的不断发展,投资者的合理期待是否应被认定为公平公正待遇下的具体内涵的问题及其引发的如何平衡东道国规制权与投资者期待利益的问题应当引起充分关注。
Gold Reserve Inc.v.Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela was a typical case under the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism,which involved issues such as how to identify jurisdiction,whether the breach of reasonable expectation should be recognized as a violation of fair and equitable treatment,and the connotation of fair and equitable treatment.The arbitral tribunal in this case combined procedural and substantive issues and,while confirming its jurisdiction,found that the respondent had violated the fair and equitable treatment clause under the BIT.The arbitral tribunal analyzed the disputes surrounding the eligibility of“investment”,the determination of reasonable expectation of investor,and the connotation and standard of fair and equitable treatment,which is an important reference for the subsequent practice of international investment arbitration.With the continuous development of international investment practice,the question of whether the reasonable expectation of investor should be recognized as a specific connotation under fair and equitable treatment and the question of how to balance the host state’s right to regulate and the interests of investors should be given due attention.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2024年第3期113-126,共14页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金
中国贸促会法律部《投资仲裁案例分析汇编》项目的部分研究成果。国家高端智库武汉大学国际法研究所教授、博士生导师漆彤担任项目课题组主持人
关键词
国际投资仲裁
公平公正待遇
投资者合理期待
international investment arbitration
fair and equitable treatment
reasonable expectation of investor
