摘要
春秋时期的华夏与楚国为什么能相互接受?社会化的成功,使得楚国名义上的“蛮夷”转变为“华夏”,主流国际关系理论从物质权力的分配、身份与互动过程中的能动性等角度对其进行解释。本文拟借鉴墨子兼爱思想,对天下主义理论进行建构,提出“天下无外”的天下主义分支理论,用以更好地解释这一现象。本文认为,“天下无外”思想核心为兼爱,在消除身份隔阂的基础上,行为体能彼此接受、相互社会化,也不需要建构主义刻意引入能动性以解释身份的变化,因为天下并无“天下”身份之外的身份,所有行为体共有同一种身份。在界定了天下无外衡量标准后,本文使用大数据文本分析对《春秋左传》进行研究,通过案例的辅助,确定了天下无外在春秋时期的中国存在。在天下无外思想的践行过程中,在天下无外的身份基础之上,华夏与楚国相互接受,社会化得以成功,可为当代中国外交思想提供借鉴。
How were Huaxia and Chu State able to accept each other during the Spring and Autumn Period?The success of socialization transformed Chu State from a socalled“barbarian”entity into a part of“Huaxia”.Mainstream international relations theories interpret this transformation from perspectives such as the distribution of material power,identity,and agency in interaction processes.This paper aims to construct a theory of Tianxiaism,drawing inspiration from Mozi's philosophy of universal love,and proposes a branch theory of“Tianxia without Outsiders”to explain this phenomenon better.It argues that the core of“Tianxia without Outsiders”is universal love.On the basis of eliminating identity barriers,actors can accept and socialize with each other without the need for constructivism to deliberately introduce agency to explain changes in identity.In the world of Tianxia,there is no identity outside of“Tianxia”;all actors share the same identity.After defining the measurement criteria for“Tianxia without Outsiders”,this paper employs big data textual analysis to study“Zuo Zhuan”(Commentary of Zuo),a historical text from the Spring and Autumn Period.Supported by case studies,the paper confirms the existence of“Tianxia without Outsiders”in China during the Spring and Autumn Period.Through the practice of“Tianxia without Outsiders”,Huaxia and Chu State were able to mutually accept and socialize with each other,providing a reference for contemporary Chinese diplomatic thought.
出处
《中国政治学》
2023年第3期62-93,129,共33页
CHINESE POLITICAL SCIENCE
基金
中流基金会
