摘要
我国与德国网络犯罪立法存在不同的基点,即立法依据公约化与本土化的差异、立法重心个人化与公共化的差异、立法模式二重化与定性化的差异。由此,二者在对象层面分别选择了数据模式与信息模式,在法益层面分别强调个体本位与集体本位,在行为层面分别注重形式评价与实质评价。晚近以来,二者呈现部分趋合的态势,具体表现在特定立场、现实问题与修正方向的一致化。在异同交融的背景下,我国网络犯罪立法既需要以开放性的视角借鉴德国的经验,也需要以主体性的视角探索自身规范模式的发展与完善。
There are different basic points in the legislation of cybercrime be-tween China and Germany,that is,the differences between localization and conven-tion as legislative basis,between individualization and publicization as legislative focus,between dualization and determination as legislative model.Therefore,the two have respectively selected data and informationl modes at object level,empha-sized individual and collective standards at legal benefit level,and emphasized formal and substantive evaluations at behavior level.Recently,the two have shown a tendency of partial convergence,which is manifested in the unification of specific positions,practical problems,and amendments.In the context of similarities and differences,China's cybercrime legislation needs to draw on the German experience from an open perspective and explore the development and improvement of its own normative model from a subjective perspective.
基金
国家社科基金青年项目“全球网络犯罪法律规则制定和中国方案研究”(项目编号:20CGJ013)
中国法学会部级研究课题青年调研项目“‘深度伪造’问题的刑事规制与限度”[项目编号:CLS(2019)Y04]的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
中国
德国
网络犯罪
立法分歧
立法趋合
China
Germany
Cybercrime
Legislative Differences
Legislative Convergence
