期刊文献+

某三甲医院2018年重症医学科死亡病例分析 被引量:3

Analysis on Death Cases in Intensive Care Unit of a Three A and Tertiary Hospital in 2018
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析某综合性三甲医院重症医学科的死亡病例,探索死亡原因分布及重点防治人群。方法利用病案统计系统导出2018年1月1日-2018年12月31日重症医学科死亡病例共165例,收集年龄、性别、主要诊断、住院时间、入院科室等信息,通过DRGs系统的分组数据,提取每份病例的死亡风险分级,采用χ2检验比较死亡风险分级在不同年龄、不同性别、不同收治科室及不同死亡时限的构成比情况。结果死亡风险分级在高风险组中,男性多于女性。165例病例的根本死亡原因主要为呼吸系统疾病、多发伤、脑内出血,而多发伤是高风险组的首要死因。结论对死亡病例做好分析总结,加强对死亡高风险组的男性患者及多发伤患者的关注,在提高业务能力的基础上促进多学科协作,从而降低住院患者死亡率。 Objectives To analyze the death cases in the intensive care unit(ICU)of a comprehensive top three hospital,and explore the causes of death and key preventable populations.Methods A total of 165 deaths in ICU were exported from the medical record system from January 1 st to December 31 st in 2018.The age,gender,major diagnosis,length of hospital stay,admission to hospital,etc.were collected.Through the grouped data of DRGs system,risk grade of death was extracted.Chi-square test was used to compare the risk grade of death in different ages,different genders,different admission departments and different time limits for death.Results Male patients were more than females of the high-risk group in risk grade of death.The mai n causes of 165 deaths were respi ratory diseases,multiple injuries,and cerebral hemorrhage.However,car accident injuries were the leading cause of death in the high-risk group.Conclusions By summarizing the death cases,pay more attention to the male patients and car accident injured patients in high-risk group,then promote multi-disciplinary cooperation on the basis of the improvement of professional abilities,finally it would help to reduce the mortality rate of hospitalized patients.
作者 翟雨 刘欣 刘乃鹏 方诗元 Zhai Yu;Liu Xin;Liu Naipeng;Fang Shiyuan(Department of Medical Affairs,The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230001,Anhui Province,China;不详)
出处 《中国病案》 2020年第9期74-76,共3页 Chinese Medical Record
关键词 重症医学 死亡病例 质量管理 ICU Death case Quality management
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献74

  • 1张涛.医疗纠纷的成因探析[J].中华医院管理杂志,2005,21(8):537-539. 被引量:117
  • 2简伟研,胡牧,崔涛,王洪源,黄因敏,张修梅.运用疾病诊断相关组进行临床服务绩效评价初探[J].中华医院管理杂志,2006,22(11):736-739. 被引量:90
  • 3刘爱民.医院管理学(病案管理分册)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:241-250. 被引量:3
  • 4Grimaldi PL,Micheletti JA.Diagnosis related groups:a practitioner's guide[M].Chicago:Pluribus Press,1982:38-41. 被引量:1
  • 5Casas M.Issues for comparability of DRG statistics in Europe:results from EURODRG[J].Health Policy,1991,17:121-132. 被引量:1
  • 6Raymond RA.The new economics of health care:DRGs,case-mix,and length of stay[M].New York:Praeger Publishers,1984:15-16. 被引量:1
  • 7Stukenborg GJ,Wagner DP,Harrell FE,et al.Hospital discharge abstract data on comorbidity improved the prediction of death among patients hospitalized with aspiration pneumonia[J].J Clin Epidemio,2004,57:522-532. 被引量:1
  • 8Reid CM,Solterbeck A,Buxton BF,et al.Developing performance indicators for cardiac surgery:A demonstration project in Victoria[J].Heart,Lung and Circulation,2001,10:S29-S33. 被引量:1
  • 9Commonwealth of Australia.Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups,Version 5.0,Definitions Manual.2002,Canberra 被引量:1
  • 10Burik D,John GN.Diagnosis related groups:tool for management[J].Hospital & Health Services Administration,1981,26:25-40. 被引量:1

共引文献155

同被引文献41

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部