期刊文献+

肿瘤标志物免疫测定的标准化 被引量:1

Standardization of Immunoassay for Tumor Markers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对肿瘤标志物免疫测定的标准化在肿瘤疾病诊断中的价值作用进行研究。方法选取我院2014年1月至2018年12月收治的28例乳腺癌患者,作为观察组;同时选取我院同期收治的28例乳腺良性肿块疾病患者,作为对照组,所选取患者的疾病情况均经病理学检查确认。临床中,采用化学发光免疫检测技术对两组患者的肿瘤标志物进行检测分析,并对其检测结果进行对比,以对肿瘤标志物免疫测定的标准化在肿瘤疾病诊断中的价值作用进行判断。结果对比显示,观察组患者CEA、CA15-3检测结果分别为(28.1±15.2)ng/mL和(49.8±23.6)U/mL,对照组分别为(7.8±4.6)ng/mL和(11.1±7.6)U/mL,两组对比差异显著,t=12.497、24.082,P<0.05,具有统计学意义。此外,对28例经病理学检查确认为乳腺癌的患者,采用化学发光免疫检测技术进行诊断显示,其符合率为26/92.9%,效果较为显著。结论采用标准的肿瘤标志物免疫测定分析进行患者肿瘤疾病诊断准确性较高,值得临床推广应用。 Objective to study value and effect of immunoassay standardization of tumor markers in diagnosis of tumor diseases.Methods choose 28 cases breast cancer patients admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 as observation group,and 28 cases benign breast mass disease patients in our hospital at the same time as control group.Disease conditions of patients were confirmed by pathological examination.In clinical practice,detect and analyze tumor markers of two groups with chemiluminescent immunoassay.Compare detection results,and analyze value and effect of immunoassay standardization of tumor markers in diagnosis of tumor diseases.Results comparison showed,detection results of CEA and CA15-3 were(28.1±15.2)ng/ml and(49.8±23.6)U/ml in observation group,and(7.8±4.6)ng/ml and(11.1±7.6)U/ml in control group respectively.Difference between two groups was statistically significant(t=12.497 and 24.082,P<0.05).In addition,chemiluminescent immunoassay diagnosis of 28 cases breast cancer confirmed with pathological examination showed,coincidence rate was 26/92.9%,with significant effect.Conclusion immunoassay standardization of tumor markers has high accuracy in diagnosis of tumor diseases,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
作者 郑公海 ZHENG Gong-hai(Laboratory Department,Jianyang City Jiajia Central Hospital,Chengdu,Sichuan 641421)
出处 《智慧健康》 2020年第3期54-55,共2页 Smart Healthcare
关键词 肿瘤标志物 免疫测定 标准化 诊断 价值作用 Tumor marker Immunoassay Standardization Diagnossis Value effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献52

  • 1吕俊杰,戴天阳,詹福生,江绪明,祝淮阳,王宗林.食管癌患者血清CEA和TNF-α的水平及意义[J].放射免疫学杂志,2004,17(5):350-351. 被引量:9
  • 2吴健民.对肿瘤标志物的再认识[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(1):11-13. 被引量:116
  • 3吴健民.影响肿瘤标志物检测的因素[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(4):352-354. 被引量:22
  • 4徐蓓,陈文祥.临床检验溯源系统的建立[J].中国计量,2007(4):34-35. 被引量:4
  • 5Pritzker KP. Cancer biomarkers: easier said than done. Clin Chem, 2002,48 (8) : 1147. 被引量:1
  • 6LI Jin-ming(李金明).Clinical Enzyme Immunoassay Technique(临床酶免疫测定技术).Beijing(北京):People’s Military Medical Press(人民军医出版社),2005.87. 被引量:1
  • 7Council Directive 98/79/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 1998 on In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices. Official Journal of the European Union L33,1998.5. 被引量:1
  • 8QUAN Hao(全浩),HAN Yong-zhi(韩永志).Reference Materials and Application(标准物质及其应用技术).2nd Ed(第二版).Beijing(北京):Standards Press of China(中国标准出版社),2003.89. 被引量:1
  • 9WHO. Recommendations for the Preparation, Characterization and Establishment of International and Other Biological Reference Standards( Revised 2004 ). 2004.36. 被引量:1
  • 10Lein M,Jung K, Elgeti U, et al. Ratio of alpha 1 - antichymotrypsin--prostate specific antigen to total prostate specific antigen in prostate cancer diagnosis. Anticancer Res, 2000,20 ( 6 D ) :4997. 被引量:1

共引文献48

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部