期刊文献+

急性胆囊炎给予腹腔镜胆囊切除术时进行胆囊三角吸引器解剖的效果评价 被引量:1

Effect Evaluation of Anatomy of Gallbladder Triangular Aspirator during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy of Acute Cholecystitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价急性胆囊炎给予腹腔镜胆囊切除术时进行胆囊三角吸引器解剖的效果。方法2018年1月至2019年6月收集研究对象,共收集研究对象110例。在尊重患者意见及根据平均分配的原则将研究对象分为55例对照组和55例观察组。对照组超声解剖胆囊三角。观察组吸引器解剖胆囊三角。结果在腹壁操作孔数量、解剖胆囊三角时间、胆管损伤率、胆汁漏发生率方面,两组的统计学分析结果为P<0.05。在术中出血量、转开腹手术率、腹腔引流率、术后住院时间、腹腔引流时间、腹腔残余感染率方面,两组的统计学分析结果为P>0.05。结论急性胆囊炎给予腹腔镜胆囊切除术时进行胆囊三角吸引器解剖在减少手术创伤、预防并发症方面可起到很大的作用。 Objective To evaluate effect of gallbladder triangular aspirator anatomy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.Methods Collect 110 cases study objects from January 2018 to June 2019,divide them into 55 cases in control group and 55 cases in observation group according to principle of patients’opinions and average distribution.Control group was treated with gallbladder triangle anatomy under ultrasound,observation group with anatomy of gallbladder triangle aspirator.Results Statistical analysis showed P<0.05 in operation holes numbers in abdominal wall,dissecting time of gallbladder triangle,bile duct injury rate and bile leakage rate.Statistical analysis showed P<0.05 in intraoperative bleeding volume,conversion rate of open surgery,abdominal drainage rate,postoperative hospital stay,abdominal drainage time,abdominal residual infection rate.Conclusion Triangle aspirator anatomy has great effect on reducing surgical trauma and preventing complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy of acute cholecystitis.
作者 徐金强 李祥 XU Jin-qiang;LI Xiang(General Surgery Department,No.964 Hospital of PLA,Changchun,Jilin 130062)
出处 《智慧健康》 2020年第17期177-178,共2页 Smart Healthcare
关键词 急性胆囊炎 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 胆囊三角吸引器解剖 Acute cholecystitis Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Anatomy of gallbladder triangle aspirator
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1向国安,陈开运,肖方联,高鹏,劳炜东,谭敏.胆囊壶腹部结石嵌顿伴胆囊积液的腹腔镜胆囊切除术[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(3):177-179. 被引量:31
  • 2陈彦波,吴唯.腹腔镜胆囊大部分切除术临床应用探讨[J].中国普通外科杂志,2007,16(2):195-196. 被引量:26
  • 3蔡秀军,顾晓静,王一帆,虞洪,梁霄.冲吸钝性解剖法显露肝总管防止腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆道损伤[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(20):1425-1426. 被引量:74
  • 4Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Fusai G, et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2008,8 (4) : CD007196. 被引量:1
  • 5Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopie cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg,2005,92 (1) :44 -49. 被引量:1
  • 6Catena F,Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S, et al. The HAC Trial ( Harmonic for Acute Cholecystitis) Study. Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of Harmonic ( H ) versus Monopolar Diathermy ( M ) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) in adults. Trials. 2009,10:34. 被引量:1
  • 7Kim JH, Kim JW, Jeong IH, et al.Surgical outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. J Gastrointest Surg, 2008,12:829 - 835. 被引量:1
  • 8Chang TC, Lin MT,Wu MH, et al. Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology, 2009,56 ( 89 ) :26 - 28. 被引量:1
  • 9Hadad SM, Vaidya JS, Baker L, et al. Delay from symptom onset increases the conversion rate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculus cholecystitis. World J Surg, 2007,31 (6) : 1298 - 1303. 被引量:1
  • 10Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An anaiysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoseopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg, 1995, 180(2) :101 - 125. 被引量:1

共引文献42

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部