摘要
明清之际关于中国礼仪之争,反方以天主教弥撒来裁度儒家祭礼,辩护则将弥撒与祭祀区隔为两不相关。"弥撒是否祭祀"的话题,于同时期的欧洲正在激烈地上演,在华因受到抑制未得以充分展开。如今重新审视以阿奎那"对象"与"方式"两相统一的祭礼神学来诠释儒家时碰到的问题、有益的经验及"比较经学"重新展开之可能性,可以发现祭祀"对象"所呈现的"临在""如在"之别,无非是神、人关系的具体表现;耶、儒祭祀之"方式"都体现出明显的神圣性。
During Chinese Rites Controversy on Sacrifices in Late and Early Qing,the counterclaim judged Confucian sacrifices in the frame of Missa.While those defenders cannot break through the bondage from the sole legitimate object of worship,therefore they had to separate Confucian sacrifices from Missa and claim them irrelevant.While the topic"whether Missa is sacrifice was under heated debate d in Europe,it was restrained in China.Nowadays,from the perspective of"comparative scripture"research,we can see there was sanctity demonstrated in the part of"mode"of Christianity and Confucianism.As to the"object",the difference manifested as"real presence"and"as if presence",is just thedemonstration of two kinds of relationships between gods and human being.We also can see both in the system of theology and the system of Confucian scripture,the points of the"Golden mean/Zhong gong"lie in liturgy of which one of the most important part is sacrifice.
出处
《宗教与历史》
2020年第1期241-253,295,共14页
Religion and History
关键词
弥撒
祭祀
中道
比较经学
Missa
Sacrifice
The Golden Mean/Zhong Yong
Comparative Scripture
