摘要
刑事案件速裁程序作为一个新兴的诉讼程序,试点工作已开展近两年时间,但对于该程序在适用过程中到底采用何种证明标准至今尚无明确定论,而基于普通程序与简易程序对证明标准的传统理解又显然不适应该程序的运行,因而需要开辟证明标准的第三条路径。当前刑事诉讼主要有对抗性司法模式、恢复性司法模式以及协商性司法模式,各模式对程序中证明标准要求也不尽相同,但只有协商性司法模式的理念能够与该程序的特点形成契合。同时,在证明标准的构建过程中,综合考虑各因素,形成层级化的体系标准是该程序在未来发展的趋势。
Immediate judgment of criminal cases,as an emerging legal process,has already launched the pilot work for two years,but there has not been explicit conclusion about the standard of proof in the application of the procedure.Besides,the traditional understanding of the standard of proof based on the ordinary procedure and simple procedure is not applicable for the running of procedures apparently.Therefore,the third approach of the standard of proof should be developed.There is mainly antagonistic justice model,restorative justice model and negotiating justice model in the current criminal procedures,with distinct requirements on the standard of proof in procedures,but the concept of negotiating justice model can agree with the characteristics of the procedure.Meanwhile,all kinds of factors should be considered comprehensively in the construction process of standard of proof,and the development of a hierarchical system standard shall be the future development trend of the procedure.
出处
《湖南警察学院学报》
2016年第4期55-61,共7页
Journal of Hunan Police Academy
关键词
刑事案件速裁程序
证明标准
犯罪事实
司法模式
层级化标准
immediate judgment of criminal cases
standard of proof
criminal fact
justice model
hierarchical standard
