期刊文献+

认识论物理主义:理解与批评 被引量:2

Epistemological Physicalism:Understanding and Criticism
原文传递
导出
摘要 物理主义和反物理主义之争构成了几十年来心灵哲学中的核心论域,二者之间的争论僵持不下。近些年来,一些物理主义者对"物理事项"(The Physical)赋予了一种新的解释,进一步提出了物理主义的无知假说:由于人类认识的局限,存在着我们人类原则上认识不到的物理性质。这种立场被称为认识论物理主义,其拥护者从无知假说出发回应了一系列反物理主义论证。本文将系统评论这种观点。与认识立场的无知假说相对应,笔者认为真正的无知是人类对未来(或理想)物理学所推设的物理性质的无知,这种无知假说较好地刻画了人类认识世界的直觉。本文将根据这种假说来回应反物理主义的论证并批评认识论物理主义。 Physicalism,a thesis that everything is physical,is the dominated view in the contemporary philosophy of mind.And it is also one of the most controversial ideas in analytic philosophy.Antiphysicalists object physicalism by proposing several arguments.Physicalists respond these objections and defend their position.To be frankly,there is no concluding remarks in the debate between physicalism and anti-physicalism.Recently,some physicalists take a new account on the conception of ' the Physical'.Based on this new concept of 'the Physical',they advanced an ignorance hypothesis:human being is cognitively limited,so they are ignorant of some object based physical property.In contrast to this ignorance hypothesis,the significant hypothesis in my mind is the claim that human being are ignorant of the physical property posited by future(ideal) physics.This hypothesis reflects the intuition that human being own.Based on this ignorance hypothesis,my paper will respond to antiphysicalisits arguments and the objections to the Epistemological Physicalism.
作者 梅剑华
出处 《世界哲学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期41-51,160,共11页 World Philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1休谟,关文运译:《人性论》,商务印书馆1991年版,第540页. 被引量:3
  • 2Armstrong, D., 1999, The Mind-Body Problem: An Opinionated Introduction,, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. 被引量:1
  • 3Conee, E. , 1994, "Phenomenal knowledge", in Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72. 被引量:1
  • 4Dennett, D. , 1991, Consciousness Explained, Boston, New York, & London: Little, Brown and Company. 被引量:1
  • 5Horgan, T. , 1984, "Jackson on physical information and qualia", in Philosophical Quarterly 32. 被引量:1
  • 6Jackson, F., 1982, "Epiphenomenal qualia", in Philosophical Quarterly 32:127 - 136 被引量:1
  • 7Jackson, F.,2004, "Looking back on the knowledge argument", in Peter Ludlow, Yujin Nagasawa, Daniel Stoljar (eds.) , There's Something About Mary : Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson's Knowledge Argument, The MIT Press. 被引量:1
  • 8Komblith, H. , 2002, Knowledge and Its Place in Nature, Oxford: Clarendon Press,. 被引量:1
  • 9Lewis, D. , 1988, "What experience teaches", in David Chalmers ( ed. ) , 2002, Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. 被引量:1
  • 10Nigam SK,Malik SK.Das HC: A profile of acceptors of non-scalpel vasectomy[].Journal of Family Welfare.1994 被引量:1

共引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部