期刊文献+

腹腔镜保守手术与药物介入治疗输卵管妊娠的对照研究 被引量:3

A comparison between laparoscopic oviduct-sparing operation and medical interventional treatment for tubal pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜保守性手术与药物介入2种方法治疗输卵管妊娠的疗效。方法2002年3月-2004年3月,我们选择63例输卵管妊娠随机分为2组,分别行腹腔镜输卵管切开吸胚术及甲氨蝶呤(MTX)经输卵管注人术,比较2种手术的疗效。结果32例腹腔镜保守手术,一次手术成功31例,成功率为96.9%。药物介入治疗31例,一次注射杀胚成功23例,二次注射杀胚成功1例,成功率77.4%,2组成功率无统计学差异(x^2=3.765,P=0.052)。腹腔镜治疗成功者血β-hCG降至正常的时间为(9.1±2.1)d,明显短于药物介人组的(26.3±3.9)d,(t=-20.974,P=0.000)。结论腹腔镜保守手术和药物介入治疗输卵管妊娠均能有效保留妊娠侧输卵管。腹腔镜保守手术较药物介入治疗输卵管妊娠有更广泛的适应证,更小的副作用,血β-hCG能更早降至正常。 Objective To compare curative effects between laparoscopic oviduct-sparing operation and medical interventional treatment for the management of tubal pregnancy. Methods A total of 63 patients with tubal pregnancy were randomly divided into two groups. One group underwent laparoscopic salpingotomy and aspiration of the gestational sac content , while the other group underwent intra-tubal injection of methotrexate (MTX). Curative effects of the two procedures were compared. Results Laparoscopic oviduct-sparing operation was successfully performed on one session in 31 out of 32 patients, the success rate being 96.9%. Medical interventional treatment was conducted successfully in 24 out of 31 patients, 23 of whom received one dose of MTX and 1 of whom received two doses, the success rate being 77.4%. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in success rates (x^2 = 3. 765, P = 0. 052). The time for serum β-hCG to normal levels was significantly shorter in patients receiving laparoscopic oviduct-sparing operation (9. 1 ± 2.1 d) than in patients receiving interventional treatment (26.3 ± 3.9 d) (t = - 20. 974, P = 0. 000). Conclusions Both laparoscopic oviduct-sparing operation and medical interventional treatment can effectively preserve affected oviduct for patients with tubal pregnancy. As compared with medical interventional treatment, laparoscopic oviduct-sparing operation has a broader range of indications, less side effects, and a shorter recovery time of serum β-hCG.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2006年第4期266-267,共2页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 输卵管妊娠 腹腔镜保守手术 介入治疗 Tubal pregnancy Laparoscopic oviduct-sparing operation Interventional treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献13

  • 1鄢利梅.腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠43例分析[J].四川医学,2004,25(10):1112-1112. 被引量:12
  • 2刘彦.实用妇科腹腔镜手术学:第1版[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2000.77-83. 被引量:2
  • 3翟藻春 孟广栋 译.腹腔镜与宫腔镜实用手册:第1版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.99-107. 被引量:1
  • 4郎景和,中华妇产科杂志,1989年,24卷,207页 被引量:1
  • 5翁梨驹,国外医学妇产科学分册,1988年,3卷,184页 被引量:1
  • 6Lecuru F,Camatte S,Viens-Bitker C,et al.Hospital resources used for ectopic pregnancy treatment by laparoscopy and methotrexate.JSLS,2001,5(2):117-122. 被引量:1
  • 7Parker J,Bisits A. Laparoscopic surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy:salpingectomy or salpingostomy?Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 1997,37:115-117. 被引量:1
  • 8Soriano D,Yefet Y,Oelsner G,et al.Operative laparoscopy for management of ectopic pregnancy in patients with hypovolemic shock[].The Journal of The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.1997 被引量:1
  • 9Yamada T,Kasamatsu H.Laparoscopic surgery with intraoperative autologous blood transfusion in patients with heavy hemoperitoneum due to ectopic pregnancy[].The Journal of The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.2000 被引量:1
  • 10Soriano D,Yefet Y,Oelsner G,et al.Is operative laparoscopy contraindicated in women with ectopic pregnancy and hypovolemic shock[].The Journal of The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.1996 被引量:1

共引文献168

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部