期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Outcome of application of primary versus secondary Illizarov's fixator in open tibial shaft fractures 被引量:1
1
作者 Anil Joshi Saurabh Singh +3 位作者 Sudeep Jain Narender Rohilla Vivek Trikha Chandra Yadav 《World Journal of Emergency Medicine》 CAS 2016年第3期221-226,共6页
BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare outcome of primary and secondary Illizarov's fi xator application as a treatment method for type III open tibial fractures in terms of nonunion and wound infection.ME... BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare outcome of primary and secondary Illizarov's fi xator application as a treatment method for type III open tibial fractures in terms of nonunion and wound infection.METHODS: This prospective study was done in a tertiary care center. Forty-eight type III tibial fractures were treated with Illizarov's apparatus between 2008 and 2011. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the treatment protocol, timing of wound closure and Illizarov's application, primary(n=28) and secondary(n=20).RESULTS: In the primary group, healing was achieved in all 28 patients. The median time to recovery was 24 weeks, and the median number of operations was 3. There were 6 patients with a bone defect. In the secondary group, complete recovery was achieved in 18 out of 20 patients. The median time to recovery was 30 weeks, and the median number of operations 5. There were 9 patients with a bone defect. The median time to recovery and the number of operations were signifi cantly smaller in patients undergoing primary operation. Union was 100% in the primary group and more than 95% in the secondary group. Chronic osteomyelitis persisted in one patient and below amputation was done in one patient in the secondary group.CONCLUSION: Primary wound closure and Illizarov's fixation required a smaller number of operations and shorter time to recovery than secondary wound closure and Illizarov's fi xation, mostly due to a signifi cantly less number of patients with a bone defect in the primary group. 展开更多
关键词 Open fractures Limb salvage DEBRIDEMENT Illizarov’s fi xator Tibial fractures
下载PDF
Ilizarov技术结合非融合理念矫治创伤后马蹄内翻足 被引量:9
2
作者 李浪 黄奇 +1 位作者 高峰 张晖 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期823-827,共5页
目的探讨Ilizarov技术结合非融合理念矫治创伤后马蹄内翻足的临床疗效。方法 2011年2月-2012年4月,收治42例创伤后马蹄内翻足。男29例,女13例;年龄17-55岁,平均34.3岁。左足24例,右足18例。病程6个月-6年,平均2.7年。术前根据畸形程度... 目的探讨Ilizarov技术结合非融合理念矫治创伤后马蹄内翻足的临床疗效。方法 2011年2月-2012年4月,收治42例创伤后马蹄内翻足。男29例,女13例;年龄17-55岁,平均34.3岁。左足24例,右足18例。病程6个月-6年,平均2.7年。术前根据畸形程度设计并组装外支架,依据Ilizar ov穿针原则将外支架固定于患侧小腿及足踝部,根据畸形情况行不同微创软组织松解;术后3-7 d旋转相应的螺纹连接杆矫正足畸形。先矫正前足内收和后足内翻,后矫正足跖屈畸形,矫形期间使患者逐渐部分负重直至完全负重,定期复查X线片观察踝关节是否有前后移位。畸形矫正后,负重行走8~12周去除外支架,佩戴行走支具和睡眠支具至少16周。手术前后采用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝与后足评分系统评价功能,疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评定疼痛改善情况。结果42例均获随访,随访时间10~24个月,平均14.3个月。术后4~13周,平均6.8周患侧踝关节恢复中立位;继续佩戴外支架行走10~16周,平均10.7周。所有患者无血管、神经损伤。3例因患者自身原因于术后10周内拆除外支架后足跖屈畸形出现反弹,跖屈畸形10°,未作特殊处理。末次随访时,患者均能弃拐正常行走。AOFAS评分为(93.4±8.0)分,较术前(52.7±10.1)分显著增加(t=—7.035,P=0.008);AOFAS综合评分获优24例,良14例,一般2例,差2例,优良率90.5%。VAS评分为(3.51±1.44)分,较术前(7.55±1.39)分明显降低(t=—0.564,P=0.025)。结论 Ilizarov技术结合非融合理念矫治创伤后马蹄内翻足疗效确切,是一种安全、微创、有效的方法。 展开更多
关键词 ILIZAROV技术 外支架 马蹄内翻足 矫形术
原文传递
一种新型可调自锁式引流线固定器在配网线路上的应用研究
3
作者 周宇 高咏梅 陈诚 《电力系统装备》 2020年第10期93-94,共2页
配电线路导线与绝缘瓷瓶的连接多采用铝线缠绕绑扎法进行固定,此方法工序复杂,施工效率低,拆除不便,不能重复使用.文章介绍了一款可调自锁式引流线固定器,分析了其结构、工作原理及实用效果,提供了线路导线固定的新方式.
关键词 配电线路导线 引流线 固定器
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部