目的探索极低出生体质量儿不同用氧方式对早产儿视网膜病变(retinopathy of prematurity,ROP)发生的影响,以便更安全地选择用氧方式,减少ROP的发生。方法回顾分析极低出生体质量儿用氧护理信息,收集2005年1月—2008年7月全部极低出生体...目的探索极低出生体质量儿不同用氧方式对早产儿视网膜病变(retinopathy of prematurity,ROP)发生的影响,以便更安全地选择用氧方式,减少ROP的发生。方法回顾分析极低出生体质量儿用氧护理信息,收集2005年1月—2008年7月全部极低出生体质量儿的病历资料,重点记录用氧方式包括给氧途径、时间、浓度,比较不同用氧方式患儿ROP的发生率,以发现可能存在的高危因素。应用SPSS13.0统计软件进行数据处理,运用统计学描述和确切概率检验。结果应用头罩吸氧方式者与未应用者相比,ROP发生率更高(P=0.012);应用机械通气者较未应用者ROP发生率更高(P=0.011)。结论头罩吸氧较其他吸氧方式ROP发生可能性更高,建议在早产儿特别是极低出生体质量儿不选用头罩吸氧方式;机械通气是发生ROP的高危因素,选择应用时应慎重;极低出生体质量儿的用氧安全浓度是否应该低于一般早产儿,是一个值得关注的问题。展开更多
Purpose: Research on clinical application effect of combining very low birth weight newborn (VLBWN) umbilical vein catheterization (UVC) with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Method: 60 cases of VLBWN ch...Purpose: Research on clinical application effect of combining very low birth weight newborn (VLBWN) umbilical vein catheterization (UVC) with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Method: 60 cases of VLBWN checked in our hospital’s ICU are selected and divided into combination group (n = 30) and PICC group (n = 30) according to the random number table. Combination of UVC and PICC is applied on newborn of combination group while only PICC is applied on newborn of PICC group. These two groups’ newborn’s PICC catheterization operation time, PICC indwelling time, weight gain, hospital stays, hospital infection, planned extubation, successful single puncture, adverse events and other indexes are observed. Result: Newborns in combination group have less PICC catheterization operation time and less hospital stays than newborns in PICC group while newborns in combination group have longer PICC indwelling time and greater weight gain than newborns in PICC group. The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Combination group’s hospital infection ratio (3.33%) is lower than that of PICC group (23.33%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Newborns in combination group have a planned extubation rate of 93.33% and a successful single puncture rate of 93.33%, which are greater than those of newborn in PICC group (respectively 73.33% and 70.00%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Newborns in combination group have an adverse event occurrence rate of 43.33%, lower than that of PICC group (70.00%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Application of combination of UVC and PICC on VLBWN can greatly improve PICC catheterization efficiency and newborn patients’ nutriture and reduce rate of complications, thus, it is worthy of clinical application.展开更多
文摘目的探索极低出生体质量儿不同用氧方式对早产儿视网膜病变(retinopathy of prematurity,ROP)发生的影响,以便更安全地选择用氧方式,减少ROP的发生。方法回顾分析极低出生体质量儿用氧护理信息,收集2005年1月—2008年7月全部极低出生体质量儿的病历资料,重点记录用氧方式包括给氧途径、时间、浓度,比较不同用氧方式患儿ROP的发生率,以发现可能存在的高危因素。应用SPSS13.0统计软件进行数据处理,运用统计学描述和确切概率检验。结果应用头罩吸氧方式者与未应用者相比,ROP发生率更高(P=0.012);应用机械通气者较未应用者ROP发生率更高(P=0.011)。结论头罩吸氧较其他吸氧方式ROP发生可能性更高,建议在早产儿特别是极低出生体质量儿不选用头罩吸氧方式;机械通气是发生ROP的高危因素,选择应用时应慎重;极低出生体质量儿的用氧安全浓度是否应该低于一般早产儿,是一个值得关注的问题。
文摘Purpose: Research on clinical application effect of combining very low birth weight newborn (VLBWN) umbilical vein catheterization (UVC) with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Method: 60 cases of VLBWN checked in our hospital’s ICU are selected and divided into combination group (n = 30) and PICC group (n = 30) according to the random number table. Combination of UVC and PICC is applied on newborn of combination group while only PICC is applied on newborn of PICC group. These two groups’ newborn’s PICC catheterization operation time, PICC indwelling time, weight gain, hospital stays, hospital infection, planned extubation, successful single puncture, adverse events and other indexes are observed. Result: Newborns in combination group have less PICC catheterization operation time and less hospital stays than newborns in PICC group while newborns in combination group have longer PICC indwelling time and greater weight gain than newborns in PICC group. The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Combination group’s hospital infection ratio (3.33%) is lower than that of PICC group (23.33%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Newborns in combination group have a planned extubation rate of 93.33% and a successful single puncture rate of 93.33%, which are greater than those of newborn in PICC group (respectively 73.33% and 70.00%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Newborns in combination group have an adverse event occurrence rate of 43.33%, lower than that of PICC group (70.00%). The difference here has statistical significance (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Application of combination of UVC and PICC on VLBWN can greatly improve PICC catheterization efficiency and newborn patients’ nutriture and reduce rate of complications, thus, it is worthy of clinical application.
