AIM To sythesize the available literature on hand dysfunction after transradial catheterization.METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE. The search results were reviewed by two independent judicators for studies that m...AIM To sythesize the available literature on hand dysfunction after transradial catheterization.METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE. The search results were reviewed by two independent judicators for studies that met the inclusion criteria and relevant reviews. We included studies that evaluated any transradial procedure and evaluated hand function outcomes post transradial procedure. There were no restrictions based on sample size. There was no restriction on method of assessing hand function which included disability, nerve damage, motor or sensory loss. There was no restriction based on language of study. Data was extracted, these results were narratively synthesized.RESULTS Out of 555 total studies 13 studies were finally included in review. A total of 3815 participants with mean age of 62.5 years were included in this review. A variety of methods were used to assess sensory and motor dysfunction of hand. Out of 13 studies included, only 3 studies reported nerve damage with a combined incidence of 0.16%, 5 studies reported sensory loss, tingling and numbness with a pooled incidence of 1.52%. Pain after transradial access was the most common form of hand dysfunction(6.67%) reported in 3 studies. The incidence of hand dysfunction defined as disability, grip strength change, power loss or any other hand complication was incredibly low at 0.26%. Although radial artery occlusion was not our primary end point for this review, it was observed in 2.41% of the participants in total of five studies included.CONCLUSION Hand dysfunction may occur post transradial catheterisation and majority of symptoms resolve without any clinical sequel.展开更多
Background Distal radial artery access(DRA)has emerged as an alternative to conventional transradial access(TRA)for percutaneous coronary interventions(PCI).This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of DRA ve...Background Distal radial artery access(DRA)has emerged as an alternative to conventional transradial access(TRA)for percutaneous coronary interventions(PCI).This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of DRA versus TRA.Methods A total of 873 participants were enrolled,divided into the DRA group(n=236)and the TRA group(n=637).The primary endpoint was the success rate of access puncture.Secondary endpoints included procedural efficiency,patient comfort,and complication rates.Baseline characteristics,procedural data,and outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups.Results The success rates for access puncture showed no significant statistical difference between the DRA and TRA groups.However,the DRA group required more puncture attempts.DRA showed significant advantages,including shorter hemostasis times,reduced access puncture and postprocedural pain,and lower incidences of radial artery occlusion(2.1%vs.6.1%,P=0.043)and hematoma(1.7%vs.5.2%,P=0.037).Conclusions DRA is a viable alternative to TRA for performing PCI,offering comparable success rates and procedural efficiency with improved patient comfort and reduced complications.展开更多
目的调查经桡动脉入路(transradial access,TRA)在中国医院外周介入中的应用现状、存在问题以及各单位开展桡动脉入路的具体需求,以便更好地推广和发展TRA在外周手术中的应用。方法2022年中国抗癌协会肿瘤介入专业委员会(Committee of I...目的调查经桡动脉入路(transradial access,TRA)在中国医院外周介入中的应用现状、存在问题以及各单位开展桡动脉入路的具体需求,以便更好地推广和发展TRA在外周手术中的应用。方法2022年中国抗癌协会肿瘤介入专业委员会(Committee of Interventional Oncology of China Anti-Cancer Association)采用横断面调查方法,在全国范围内调查TRA外周介入手术情况并进行统计学分析。结果共60家医院参与了调查问卷填写,结果显示TRA外周介入手术量远低于经股动脉入路(transfemoral access,TFA),且在各医院之间存在较大差异。阻碍TRA开展的首要因素是无合适的导管和桡动脉穿刺困难。86.67%的医疗机构希望器械改进或研发新器械,尤其是导管、微导管、导丝。60.00%医疗机构希望能加强系统性培训以及进行多中心临床研究。结论国内多家医疗机构已熟练掌握TRA外周介入手术,但须加强系统性培训及进一步普及TRA在外周介入的应用,而且更适合TRA的器械亟待研发。展开更多
目的探讨经桡动脉入路脑血管造影中持续动脉压监测在发现导管扭转打结中的作用。方法回顾性分析2017年7月至2019年12月接受经桡动脉入路脑血管造影的116例缺血性脑血管病患者的临床病例资料,其中80例造影过程中接受持续动脉压监测(测压...目的探讨经桡动脉入路脑血管造影中持续动脉压监测在发现导管扭转打结中的作用。方法回顾性分析2017年7月至2019年12月接受经桡动脉入路脑血管造影的116例缺血性脑血管病患者的临床病例资料,其中80例造影过程中接受持续动脉压监测(测压组),另36例作为无测压组。在操作过程中,动脉压力差变小甚至曲线变平提示导管某段发生扭转打结。比较两组患者的性别、年龄、主动脉弓型等基本临床病例信息,手术适应证、透视时间、手术时间,以及造影过程中导管扭转打结发生率。结果两组患者性别、年龄、主动脉弓型、透视时间、手术时间差异均无统计学意义。测压组动脉导管扭转打结发生率低于无测压组(0 vs 8.33%,P=0.047)。结论持续动脉压力监测有助于发现早期桡动脉入路脑血管造影过程中导管扭转打结,进而降低相关并发症的发生,值得推广应用。展开更多
文摘AIM To sythesize the available literature on hand dysfunction after transradial catheterization.METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE. The search results were reviewed by two independent judicators for studies that met the inclusion criteria and relevant reviews. We included studies that evaluated any transradial procedure and evaluated hand function outcomes post transradial procedure. There were no restrictions based on sample size. There was no restriction on method of assessing hand function which included disability, nerve damage, motor or sensory loss. There was no restriction based on language of study. Data was extracted, these results were narratively synthesized.RESULTS Out of 555 total studies 13 studies were finally included in review. A total of 3815 participants with mean age of 62.5 years were included in this review. A variety of methods were used to assess sensory and motor dysfunction of hand. Out of 13 studies included, only 3 studies reported nerve damage with a combined incidence of 0.16%, 5 studies reported sensory loss, tingling and numbness with a pooled incidence of 1.52%. Pain after transradial access was the most common form of hand dysfunction(6.67%) reported in 3 studies. The incidence of hand dysfunction defined as disability, grip strength change, power loss or any other hand complication was incredibly low at 0.26%. Although radial artery occlusion was not our primary end point for this review, it was observed in 2.41% of the participants in total of five studies included.CONCLUSION Hand dysfunction may occur post transradial catheterisation and majority of symptoms resolve without any clinical sequel.
基金supported by the Wuzhou Science and Technology Project(No.202102094)。
文摘Background Distal radial artery access(DRA)has emerged as an alternative to conventional transradial access(TRA)for percutaneous coronary interventions(PCI).This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of DRA versus TRA.Methods A total of 873 participants were enrolled,divided into the DRA group(n=236)and the TRA group(n=637).The primary endpoint was the success rate of access puncture.Secondary endpoints included procedural efficiency,patient comfort,and complication rates.Baseline characteristics,procedural data,and outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups.Results The success rates for access puncture showed no significant statistical difference between the DRA and TRA groups.However,the DRA group required more puncture attempts.DRA showed significant advantages,including shorter hemostasis times,reduced access puncture and postprocedural pain,and lower incidences of radial artery occlusion(2.1%vs.6.1%,P=0.043)and hematoma(1.7%vs.5.2%,P=0.037).Conclusions DRA is a viable alternative to TRA for performing PCI,offering comparable success rates and procedural efficiency with improved patient comfort and reduced complications.
文摘目的调查经桡动脉入路(transradial access,TRA)在中国医院外周介入中的应用现状、存在问题以及各单位开展桡动脉入路的具体需求,以便更好地推广和发展TRA在外周手术中的应用。方法2022年中国抗癌协会肿瘤介入专业委员会(Committee of Interventional Oncology of China Anti-Cancer Association)采用横断面调查方法,在全国范围内调查TRA外周介入手术情况并进行统计学分析。结果共60家医院参与了调查问卷填写,结果显示TRA外周介入手术量远低于经股动脉入路(transfemoral access,TFA),且在各医院之间存在较大差异。阻碍TRA开展的首要因素是无合适的导管和桡动脉穿刺困难。86.67%的医疗机构希望器械改进或研发新器械,尤其是导管、微导管、导丝。60.00%医疗机构希望能加强系统性培训以及进行多中心临床研究。结论国内多家医疗机构已熟练掌握TRA外周介入手术,但须加强系统性培训及进一步普及TRA在外周介入的应用,而且更适合TRA的器械亟待研发。
文摘目的探讨经桡动脉入路脑血管造影中持续动脉压监测在发现导管扭转打结中的作用。方法回顾性分析2017年7月至2019年12月接受经桡动脉入路脑血管造影的116例缺血性脑血管病患者的临床病例资料,其中80例造影过程中接受持续动脉压监测(测压组),另36例作为无测压组。在操作过程中,动脉压力差变小甚至曲线变平提示导管某段发生扭转打结。比较两组患者的性别、年龄、主动脉弓型等基本临床病例信息,手术适应证、透视时间、手术时间,以及造影过程中导管扭转打结发生率。结果两组患者性别、年龄、主动脉弓型、透视时间、手术时间差异均无统计学意义。测压组动脉导管扭转打结发生率低于无测压组(0 vs 8.33%,P=0.047)。结论持续动脉压力监测有助于发现早期桡动脉入路脑血管造影过程中导管扭转打结,进而降低相关并发症的发生,值得推广应用。
