BACKGROUND Laparoscopy has been widely used in general surgical procedures,but total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(TLPD)is still a complex and challenging surgery that is only performed in a small number of pat...BACKGROUND Laparoscopy has been widely used in general surgical procedures,but total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(TLPD)is still a complex and challenging surgery that is only performed in a small number of patients at a few large academic medical centers.Although the safety and feasibility of TLPD have been established,few studies have compared it with open pancreaticoduodenectomy(OPD)with regard to perioperative and oncological outcomes.Therefore,we carried out a meta-analysis to evaluate whether TLPD is superior to OPD.AIM To compare the treatment outcomes of TLPD and OPD in order to assess the safety and feasibility of TLPD.METHODS We conducted a systematic search of studies comparing TLPD with OPD that were published in the PubMed,EMBASE,and Cochrane Library databases through December 31,2018.The studies comparing TLPD and OPD with at least one of the outcomes we were interested in and with more than 10 cases in each group were included in this analysis.The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the nonrandomized controlled trials and the Jadad scale was used to assess the randomized controlled trials.Intraoperative data,postoperative complications,and oncologic outcomes were evaluated.The metaanalysis was performed using Review Manager Software version 5.3.Random or fixed-effects meta-analyses were undertaken to measure the pooled estimates.RESULTS A total of 4790 articles were initially identified for our study.After screening,4762 articles were excluded and 28 studies representing 39771 patients(3543 undergoing TLPD and 36228 undergoing OPD)were eventually included.Patients who underwent TLPD had less intraoperative blood loss[weighted mean difference(WMD)=-260.08 mL,95%confidence interval(CI):(-336.02,-184.14)mL,P<0.00001],a lower blood transfusion rate[odds ratio(OR)=0.51,95%CI:0.36-0.72,P=0.0001],a lower perioperative overall morbidity(OR=0.82,95%CI:0.73-0.92,P=0.0008),a lower wound infection rate(OR=0.48,95%CI:0.34-0.67,P<0.0001),a lower pneumonia rate(OR=0.72,95%CI:0.60-0.85,展开更多
目的探讨学习曲线期腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)治疗体会。方法回顾性分析郑州大学附属郑州中心医院肝胆胰外科2017年6月至2019年12月间实施的71例LPD患者的临床资料,包括全腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(TLPD)以及腹腔镜下标本切除、上腹部...目的探讨学习曲线期腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)治疗体会。方法回顾性分析郑州大学附属郑州中心医院肝胆胰外科2017年6月至2019年12月间实施的71例LPD患者的临床资料,包括全腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(TLPD)以及腹腔镜下标本切除、上腹部切口消化道重建的腹腔镜辅助胰十二指肠切除术(LAPD)两种术式。按照时间将前15个月完成的32例设为初期组,其后16个月完成的39例设为后期组。统计分析初期组和后期组中TLPD术和LAPD术情况,两组TLPD术的术前、术中、术后相关临床指标。结果患者均顺利完成手术。在初期组中,TLPD术与LAPD术分别为9例(28.1%)和23例(71.9%);与LAPD术比较,TLPD术手术时间[(425.0±34.0)min vs (330.9±14.7)min,t=11.067,P<0.001]、胰肠吻合时间[(46.6±2.2)min vs (21.2±7.4)min,t=9.993,P<0.001]均延长,术后B/C级胰瘘发生率增高[4例(44.4%) vs 1例(4.3%),P=0.015],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在后期组中,TLPD术与LAPD术分别为30例(76.9%)和9例(23.1%);与LAPD术比较,TLPD术手术时间[(376.0±23.7)min vs (345.6±19.1)min,t=3.498,P=0.001]、胰肠吻合时间[(34.1±6.5)min vs (16.5±1.3)min,t=7.758,P<0.001]均延长,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但术后B/C级胰瘘发生率两种术式间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。与初期组TLPD术比较,后期组TLPD术手术时间[(376.0±23.7)min vs (425.0±34.0)min,t=-4.904,P<0.001]、胰肠吻合时间明显缩短[(34.1±6.5)min vs (46.6±2.2)min,t=-5.634,P<0.001],术后B/C级胰瘘发生率明显降低[3例(10.0%) vs 4例(44.4%),P=0.037]。结论在学习曲线期,TLPD术手术时间长,胰肠吻合时间长,胰瘘发生率高。可将LAPD作为消化道重建困难、胰瘘风险高的患者的辅助术式,手术医师再逐步提升TLPD术技术水平。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Laparoscopy has been widely used in general surgical procedures,but total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(TLPD)is still a complex and challenging surgery that is only performed in a small number of patients at a few large academic medical centers.Although the safety and feasibility of TLPD have been established,few studies have compared it with open pancreaticoduodenectomy(OPD)with regard to perioperative and oncological outcomes.Therefore,we carried out a meta-analysis to evaluate whether TLPD is superior to OPD.AIM To compare the treatment outcomes of TLPD and OPD in order to assess the safety and feasibility of TLPD.METHODS We conducted a systematic search of studies comparing TLPD with OPD that were published in the PubMed,EMBASE,and Cochrane Library databases through December 31,2018.The studies comparing TLPD and OPD with at least one of the outcomes we were interested in and with more than 10 cases in each group were included in this analysis.The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the nonrandomized controlled trials and the Jadad scale was used to assess the randomized controlled trials.Intraoperative data,postoperative complications,and oncologic outcomes were evaluated.The metaanalysis was performed using Review Manager Software version 5.3.Random or fixed-effects meta-analyses were undertaken to measure the pooled estimates.RESULTS A total of 4790 articles were initially identified for our study.After screening,4762 articles were excluded and 28 studies representing 39771 patients(3543 undergoing TLPD and 36228 undergoing OPD)were eventually included.Patients who underwent TLPD had less intraoperative blood loss[weighted mean difference(WMD)=-260.08 mL,95%confidence interval(CI):(-336.02,-184.14)mL,P<0.00001],a lower blood transfusion rate[odds ratio(OR)=0.51,95%CI:0.36-0.72,P=0.0001],a lower perioperative overall morbidity(OR=0.82,95%CI:0.73-0.92,P=0.0008),a lower wound infection rate(OR=0.48,95%CI:0.34-0.67,P<0.0001),a lower pneumonia rate(OR=0.72,95%CI:0.60-0.85,
文摘目的探讨学习曲线期腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)治疗体会。方法回顾性分析郑州大学附属郑州中心医院肝胆胰外科2017年6月至2019年12月间实施的71例LPD患者的临床资料,包括全腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(TLPD)以及腹腔镜下标本切除、上腹部切口消化道重建的腹腔镜辅助胰十二指肠切除术(LAPD)两种术式。按照时间将前15个月完成的32例设为初期组,其后16个月完成的39例设为后期组。统计分析初期组和后期组中TLPD术和LAPD术情况,两组TLPD术的术前、术中、术后相关临床指标。结果患者均顺利完成手术。在初期组中,TLPD术与LAPD术分别为9例(28.1%)和23例(71.9%);与LAPD术比较,TLPD术手术时间[(425.0±34.0)min vs (330.9±14.7)min,t=11.067,P<0.001]、胰肠吻合时间[(46.6±2.2)min vs (21.2±7.4)min,t=9.993,P<0.001]均延长,术后B/C级胰瘘发生率增高[4例(44.4%) vs 1例(4.3%),P=0.015],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在后期组中,TLPD术与LAPD术分别为30例(76.9%)和9例(23.1%);与LAPD术比较,TLPD术手术时间[(376.0±23.7)min vs (345.6±19.1)min,t=3.498,P=0.001]、胰肠吻合时间[(34.1±6.5)min vs (16.5±1.3)min,t=7.758,P<0.001]均延长,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但术后B/C级胰瘘发生率两种术式间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。与初期组TLPD术比较,后期组TLPD术手术时间[(376.0±23.7)min vs (425.0±34.0)min,t=-4.904,P<0.001]、胰肠吻合时间明显缩短[(34.1±6.5)min vs (46.6±2.2)min,t=-5.634,P<0.001],术后B/C级胰瘘发生率明显降低[3例(10.0%) vs 4例(44.4%),P=0.037]。结论在学习曲线期,TLPD术手术时间长,胰肠吻合时间长,胰瘘发生率高。可将LAPD作为消化道重建困难、胰瘘风险高的患者的辅助术式,手术医师再逐步提升TLPD术技术水平。
