Background Primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） has been identified as the first therapeutic option for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI）. The strategy of transferr...Background Primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） has been identified as the first therapeutic option for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI）. The strategy of transferring patient to a PCI center was recently recommended for those with acute STEMI who were present to PCI incapable hospitals, which include lack of facilities or experienced operators. In China, some local hospitals have been equipped with PCI facilities, but they have no interventional physicians qualified for performing primary PCI. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the strategy of transferring physician to a PCI-equipped hospital to perform primary PCI for patients with acute STEMI. Methods Three hundred and thirty-four consecutive STEMI patients with symptom presentation 〈12 hours in five local hospitals from November 2005 to November 2007 were randomized to receive primary PCI by either physician transfer （physician transfer group, n=165） or patient transfer （patient transfer group, n=169） strategy. Door-to-balloon time, in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac events （MACE, including death, non-fatal re-infarction, and target vessel revascularization） were compared between the two groups. Results Baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction （TIMI） 3 flow was revealed in more patients in the physician transfer group at initial angiography （17.6% vs 10.1%, P〈0.05）. The success rate of primary PCI （96.3% vs 95.4%, P〉0.05） and length of hospital stay were similar between the two groups （（15±4） days vs （14±3） days, P〉0.05）. In the physician transfer group, door-to-balloon time was significantly shortened （（95±20） minutes vs （147±29） minutes, P〈0.0001） and more patients received primary PCI with door-to-balloon time less than 90 minutes （21.2% vs 7.7%, P〈0.001）. During hospitalization, MACE occurred in 6.7% and 11.2% of patients 展开更多
在利用GPS CV(GPS Common View)技术进行高精度时间比对时,电离层和卫星位置误差对观测到的卫星信号的影响是不容忽视的,需要对它进行精确的估计和改正.讨论IGS精密星历和CODE全球总电子含量图(TEC MAPs)在GPS时间传递中的应用.计算结...在利用GPS CV(GPS Common View)技术进行高精度时间比对时,电离层和卫星位置误差对观测到的卫星信号的影响是不容忽视的,需要对它进行精确的估计和改正.讨论IGS精密星历和CODE全球总电子含量图(TEC MAPs)在GPS时间传递中的应用.计算结果表明,采用IGS产品可有效提高单站定时和远距离时间传递的精度.展开更多
文摘Background Primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） has been identified as the first therapeutic option for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI）. The strategy of transferring patient to a PCI center was recently recommended for those with acute STEMI who were present to PCI incapable hospitals, which include lack of facilities or experienced operators. In China, some local hospitals have been equipped with PCI facilities, but they have no interventional physicians qualified for performing primary PCI. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the strategy of transferring physician to a PCI-equipped hospital to perform primary PCI for patients with acute STEMI. Methods Three hundred and thirty-four consecutive STEMI patients with symptom presentation 〈12 hours in five local hospitals from November 2005 to November 2007 were randomized to receive primary PCI by either physician transfer （physician transfer group, n=165） or patient transfer （patient transfer group, n=169） strategy. Door-to-balloon time, in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac events （MACE, including death, non-fatal re-infarction, and target vessel revascularization） were compared between the two groups. Results Baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction （TIMI） 3 flow was revealed in more patients in the physician transfer group at initial angiography （17.6% vs 10.1%, P〈0.05）. The success rate of primary PCI （96.3% vs 95.4%, P〉0.05） and length of hospital stay were similar between the two groups （（15±4） days vs （14±3） days, P〉0.05）. In the physician transfer group, door-to-balloon time was significantly shortened （（95±20） minutes vs （147±29） minutes, P〈0.0001） and more patients received primary PCI with door-to-balloon time less than 90 minutes （21.2% vs 7.7%, P〈0.001）. During hospitalization, MACE occurred in 6.7% and 11.2% of patients
文摘在利用GPS CV(GPS Common View)技术进行高精度时间比对时,电离层和卫星位置误差对观测到的卫星信号的影响是不容忽视的,需要对它进行精确的估计和改正.讨论IGS精密星历和CODE全球总电子含量图(TEC MAPs)在GPS时间传递中的应用.计算结果表明,采用IGS产品可有效提高单站定时和远距离时间传递的精度.
