<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Introduction:</strong></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Regional anaesthesia combined with general anaesthesia reduc...<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Introduction:</strong></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Regional anaesthesia combined with general anaesthesia reduces </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">stress response to surgery, duration of ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">stay and promotes early recovery. Studies on thoracic epidural, caudal analgesi</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">a along wit</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h general anaesthesia (GA) in paediatric </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">cardiac surgery are limited he</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">nce we aimed to compare efficacy and safety of caudal, thoracic epid</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ural and intravenous analgesia in paediatric cardiac surgery. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methodology: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology in a tertiary care teaching hospital in southern India from February 2019 to December 2019. 90 children were randomised into group A, group B, group C. Children in group A received caudal analgesia along with GA. Group B children received thoracic epidural along with GA. Group C patients received intravenous analgesia along with GA. Rescue analgesia 1 mcg/kg fentanyl given in all 3 groups if p</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ai</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">n score is more than 4. Primary outcome assessed was post-o</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p pain sco</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">res. Secondary outcome assessed was duration of ventilation, duration of intensive care unit stay. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> All patients were comparable in terms of age, sex, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">weight, mean RACHS score, baseline heart rate and blood pressure. Pain sco</span><span s展开更多
<b><span>Background and Objectives: </span></b><span>The main benefits of laparoscopic surgery in comparison to open surgery involve the rapid discharge from recovery room, decreased post...<b><span>Background and Objectives: </span></b><span>The main benefits of laparoscopic surgery in comparison to open surgery involve the rapid discharge from recovery room, decreased postoperative hospital stays, reduced postoperative discomfort, easier getting back to work and faster return to ordinary daily life as well as cosmetic surgical wounds. The anesthesia type has an essential role in attenuation of the surgical stress and achievement of these advantages. We aimed to determine the outcome of giving general anesthesia in conjunction with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) compared to general anesthesia alone on stress response to surgery and anesthesia by investigating cytokine reaction (interleukin 6 and 8 levels), hemodynamic changes (BP, HR, RR, SPO2), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores postoperatively in patients subjected for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. </span><b><span>Methods: </span></b><span>This study included 40 patients aged 20</span><span> </span><span>- 60 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I and II. They were planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Aswan University Hospital from April 2017 to March 2018. They were randomly allocated into two groups.</span><b><span> </span></b><span>Group A (n. 20) received general anesthesia only and Group B (n. 20) received general anesthesia in conjunction with thoracic epidural analgesia using fentanyl and bupivacaine in the epidural catheter. Chi-square was applied to differentiate categorical variables, whereas comparison between continuous variables was done by using t-test. Two-tailed p < 0.05 was estimated as statistically signi</span><span>fi</span><span>cant. </span><b><span>Results:</span></b><span> As regards IL-6 and IL-8 post-operative there is significant difference (p < 0.05) between two groups during 2</span><sup><span style="vertical-align:super;">nd</span></sup><span> and 4</span><sup><span style="vertical-align:super;">th</span></sup><span> hr and 24</span><sup><span style="vertical-a展开更多
文摘<span style="font-family:Verdana;"><strong>Introduction:</strong></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Regional anaesthesia combined with general anaesthesia reduces </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">stress response to surgery, duration of ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">stay and promotes early recovery. Studies on thoracic epidural, caudal analgesi</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">a along wit</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">h general anaesthesia (GA) in paediatric </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">cardiac surgery are limited he</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">nce we aimed to compare efficacy and safety of caudal, thoracic epid</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ural and intravenous analgesia in paediatric cardiac surgery. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methodology: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology in a tertiary care teaching hospital in southern India from February 2019 to December 2019. 90 children were randomised into group A, group B, group C. Children in group A received caudal analgesia along with GA. Group B children received thoracic epidural along with GA. Group C patients received intravenous analgesia along with GA. Rescue analgesia 1 mcg/kg fentanyl given in all 3 groups if p</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ai</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">n score is more than 4. Primary outcome assessed was post-o</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p pain sco</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">res. Secondary outcome assessed was duration of ventilation, duration of intensive care unit stay. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> All patients were comparable in terms of age, sex, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">weight, mean RACHS score, baseline heart rate and blood pressure. Pain sco</span><span s
文摘<b><span>Background and Objectives: </span></b><span>The main benefits of laparoscopic surgery in comparison to open surgery involve the rapid discharge from recovery room, decreased postoperative hospital stays, reduced postoperative discomfort, easier getting back to work and faster return to ordinary daily life as well as cosmetic surgical wounds. The anesthesia type has an essential role in attenuation of the surgical stress and achievement of these advantages. We aimed to determine the outcome of giving general anesthesia in conjunction with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) compared to general anesthesia alone on stress response to surgery and anesthesia by investigating cytokine reaction (interleukin 6 and 8 levels), hemodynamic changes (BP, HR, RR, SPO2), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores postoperatively in patients subjected for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. </span><b><span>Methods: </span></b><span>This study included 40 patients aged 20</span><span> </span><span>- 60 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I and II. They were planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Aswan University Hospital from April 2017 to March 2018. They were randomly allocated into two groups.</span><b><span> </span></b><span>Group A (n. 20) received general anesthesia only and Group B (n. 20) received general anesthesia in conjunction with thoracic epidural analgesia using fentanyl and bupivacaine in the epidural catheter. Chi-square was applied to differentiate categorical variables, whereas comparison between continuous variables was done by using t-test. Two-tailed p < 0.05 was estimated as statistically signi</span><span>fi</span><span>cant. </span><b><span>Results:</span></b><span> As regards IL-6 and IL-8 post-operative there is significant difference (p < 0.05) between two groups during 2</span><sup><span style="vertical-align:super;">nd</span></sup><span> and 4</span><sup><span style="vertical-align:super;">th</span></sup><span> hr and 24</span><sup><span style="vertical-a
