OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pain scores and rehabilitation of patientis with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy receiving massage therapy combined with traction and ultrashort wave therapy. METHODS: A total of 84 patie...OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pain scores and rehabilitation of patientis with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy receiving massage therapy combined with traction and ultrashort wave therapy. METHODS: A total of 84 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy treated in 105 Hospital of People's Liberation Army from June 2014 to June 2017 were included and divided into study group and control group according to different treatment regimens. A total of 42 patients in the study group was treated with cervical traction, ultrashort wave and massage therapy at the same time, whereas the other 42 patients in the control group were only treated with cervical traction and ultrashort wave. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of the 2 groups was made and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores before and after treatment were observed to assess the patient's pain. Comparison of rehabilitation in the 2 groups was made by applying the Clinical Assessment Scale for Cervical Spondylosis (CASCS). RESULTS: After comparing the therapeutic effect between the study group and the control group, it showed that the total effective rate (90.48%) in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (73.81%), the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). By comparing the incidence of adverse reactions in the study group and the control group, results showed that the incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea, palpitations, vomiting, sweating, dizziness and colorless complexion in the study group (9.52%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (21.43%), the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After the treatment, the VAS pain scores of the study group and the control group were both significantly improved (P < 0.05), but the improvement of the patients in the study group was more significantly (P < 0.05), and the difference was statistically significant. After treatment, the CASCS scores of the patients in the study group and the control group were sig展开更多
文摘OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pain scores and rehabilitation of patientis with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy receiving massage therapy combined with traction and ultrashort wave therapy. METHODS: A total of 84 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy treated in 105 Hospital of People's Liberation Army from June 2014 to June 2017 were included and divided into study group and control group according to different treatment regimens. A total of 42 patients in the study group was treated with cervical traction, ultrashort wave and massage therapy at the same time, whereas the other 42 patients in the control group were only treated with cervical traction and ultrashort wave. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of the 2 groups was made and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores before and after treatment were observed to assess the patient's pain. Comparison of rehabilitation in the 2 groups was made by applying the Clinical Assessment Scale for Cervical Spondylosis (CASCS). RESULTS: After comparing the therapeutic effect between the study group and the control group, it showed that the total effective rate (90.48%) in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (73.81%), the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). By comparing the incidence of adverse reactions in the study group and the control group, results showed that the incidence of adverse reactions such as nausea, palpitations, vomiting, sweating, dizziness and colorless complexion in the study group (9.52%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (21.43%), the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After the treatment, the VAS pain scores of the study group and the control group were both significantly improved (P < 0.05), but the improvement of the patients in the study group was more significantly (P < 0.05), and the difference was statistically significant. After treatment, the CASCS scores of the patients in the study group and the control group were sig
