目的:检验《国际功能、残疾和健康分类?康复组合》(the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set)在非急性期患者中使用的信度与效度。方法:广东、福建、湖北省13个研究中心有515例非...目的:检验《国际功能、残疾和健康分类?康复组合》(the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set)在非急性期患者中使用的信度与效度。方法:广东、福建、湖北省13个研究中心有515例非急性期患者参与研究,采用ICF康复组合、Barthel指数(Barthel Index)、SF-36(Short Form-36)进行评定。分析ICF康复组合的内在一致性、评定者间信度、评定者内信度和效标关联效度。结果:ICF康复组合的身体功能、活动和参与成分的Cronbach α系数分别是0.69和0.87;评定者间一致率和加权Kappa系数均值为68.5%和0.73;评定者内信度结果显示一致率和加权Kappa系数均值分别是81.7%和0.82;身体功能、活动、参与三个成分与Barthel指数呈中度至高度负相关(r=-0.498--0.887,P<0.01),与SF-36中生理功能成分的相关性尚可(r=-0.524--0.900,P<0.01),与躯体疼痛成分没有相关性或相关性较差,与SF-36的生理职能、总体健康、活力、社会功能、情感职能和精神健康成分呈现中到低度的相关性(r=-0.254--0.547,P<0.01)。结论:ICF康复组合具有较好的信度与效度,适合作为评定工具在临床实践中使用。展开更多
目的:验证基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》康复组合(international classification of functioning,disability and health rehabilitation set)的功能评定工具在老年失能评估中的区分度及信度。方法:全国15家养老机构的1610例老人参...目的:验证基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》康复组合(international classification of functioning,disability and health rehabilitation set)的功能评定工具在老年失能评估中的区分度及信度。方法:全国15家养老机构的1610例老人参与本研究。以基于ICF康复组合的功能评定工具对老人进行失能评估,以数字化评定量表(0—10分)评估条目失能程度。以分割点的临界值分析量表的区分度,以条目与总分相关性及量表内部一致性分析量表的信度。结果:以样本数量的27%作为分割点,量表高分组与低分组的临界值(t值)均大于3.0(P<0.05)。量表除b134睡眠和b280痛感外,条目与总分的相关系数在0.566—0.914,均达到标准(P<0.05)。失能评估量表的内部一致性α系数为0.965,b134睡眠和b280痛感条目删除后的α值高于0.965。结论:基于ICF康复组合的失能评定工具与数字评定量表联合在老年失能评定中有良好的区分度和内部一致性,条目b134睡眠与b280痛感同质性不良。展开更多
The development of an effective and inexpensive device to restore and enhance the human musculoskeletal functions is of particular interest. Sling exercise therapy (SET) is one of the most effective developed tools in...The development of an effective and inexpensive device to restore and enhance the human musculoskeletal functions is of particular interest. Sling exercise therapy (SET) is one of the most effective developed tools in rehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders, which has been successfully used in various applications ranging from diagnosis to treatment. To the best of our knowledge, SET has never been comprehended and reviewed previously. Therefore, it was highly required to further understand the role of SET in various therapeutic applications. Inspired by this herein, this study is dedicated to emphasize the advancement in utilization of the SET in both diagnosis and treatment as well as their related challenges. This would be concluded by future perspectives of the SET.展开更多
文摘目的:检验《国际功能、残疾和健康分类?康复组合》(the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set)在非急性期患者中使用的信度与效度。方法:广东、福建、湖北省13个研究中心有515例非急性期患者参与研究,采用ICF康复组合、Barthel指数(Barthel Index)、SF-36(Short Form-36)进行评定。分析ICF康复组合的内在一致性、评定者间信度、评定者内信度和效标关联效度。结果:ICF康复组合的身体功能、活动和参与成分的Cronbach α系数分别是0.69和0.87;评定者间一致率和加权Kappa系数均值为68.5%和0.73;评定者内信度结果显示一致率和加权Kappa系数均值分别是81.7%和0.82;身体功能、活动、参与三个成分与Barthel指数呈中度至高度负相关(r=-0.498--0.887,P<0.01),与SF-36中生理功能成分的相关性尚可(r=-0.524--0.900,P<0.01),与躯体疼痛成分没有相关性或相关性较差,与SF-36的生理职能、总体健康、活力、社会功能、情感职能和精神健康成分呈现中到低度的相关性(r=-0.254--0.547,P<0.01)。结论:ICF康复组合具有较好的信度与效度,适合作为评定工具在临床实践中使用。
文摘目的:验证基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》康复组合(international classification of functioning,disability and health rehabilitation set)的功能评定工具在老年失能评估中的区分度及信度。方法:全国15家养老机构的1610例老人参与本研究。以基于ICF康复组合的功能评定工具对老人进行失能评估,以数字化评定量表(0—10分)评估条目失能程度。以分割点的临界值分析量表的区分度,以条目与总分相关性及量表内部一致性分析量表的信度。结果:以样本数量的27%作为分割点,量表高分组与低分组的临界值(t值)均大于3.0(P<0.05)。量表除b134睡眠和b280痛感外,条目与总分的相关系数在0.566—0.914,均达到标准(P<0.05)。失能评估量表的内部一致性α系数为0.965,b134睡眠和b280痛感条目删除后的α值高于0.965。结论:基于ICF康复组合的失能评定工具与数字评定量表联合在老年失能评定中有良好的区分度和内部一致性,条目b134睡眠与b280痛感同质性不良。
文摘The development of an effective and inexpensive device to restore and enhance the human musculoskeletal functions is of particular interest. Sling exercise therapy (SET) is one of the most effective developed tools in rehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders, which has been successfully used in various applications ranging from diagnosis to treatment. To the best of our knowledge, SET has never been comprehended and reviewed previously. Therefore, it was highly required to further understand the role of SET in various therapeutic applications. Inspired by this herein, this study is dedicated to emphasize the advancement in utilization of the SET in both diagnosis and treatment as well as their related challenges. This would be concluded by future perspectives of the SET.
