目的:系统评价重组改构人肿瘤坏死因子(rmhTNF)对比顺铂胸腔灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效和安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库、中国科技期刊数据库、中国医学生物文献数...目的:系统评价重组改构人肿瘤坏死因子(rmhTNF)对比顺铂胸腔灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效和安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库、中国科技期刊数据库、中国医学生物文献数据库,纳入rmhTNF(试验组)对比顺铂(对照组)胸腔灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液的随机对照试验(RCT),提取资料并按照Cochrane系统评价员手册5.3.0评价质量后,采用RevMan 5.3统计软件对数据进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入7项RCT,合计478例患者。Meta分析结果显示,试验组患者临床总有效率[RR=1.43,95%CI(1.27,1.62),P<0.001]显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义;试验组患者胃肠道反应[RR=1.15,95%CI(0.73,1.80),P=0.55]、胸痛[RR=1.12,95%CI(0.73,1.73),P=0.60]、发热[RR=0.62,95%CI(0.35,1.08),P=0.09]、骨髓抑制[OR=0.94,95%CI(0.57,1.54),P=0.79]发生率与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:rmhTNF胸腔灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液疗效显著优于顺铂,胃肠道反应、胸痛、发热、骨髓抑制等毒副反应的发生率与顺铂相当。展开更多
The efficacy and safety of the recombinant mutant human tumor necrosis factor （rmhTNF） combined with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer （SCLC） were evaluate...The efficacy and safety of the recombinant mutant human tumor necrosis factor （rmhTNF） combined with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer （SCLC） were evaluated in this study. The selected 37 patients with SCLC were divided into experimental group （n= 18） and control group （n= 19）. Both groups were subjected to EP regimen. While in the experimental group, a regimen of 4 × 10^6 U/m^2 rmhTNF intramuscular injection was given once a day from the 1st to 7th day and 11th to 17th day on the chemotherapy cycle. Twenty-one days were as a chemotherapy cycle and all patients received treatment with 2 cycles. The response rate was 83.3 % （15/18） in the experimental group and 63.2 % （12/19） in the control group respectively （P〈0.05）. The KPS score after treatment was 78. 4±9.6 in the experimental group and 71.2±9.7 in the control group with the difference being significant （P〈0. 05）. No severe adverse effects occurred in the two groups. It was concluded that the curative effectiveness of the rmhTNF combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of SCLC was more satisfactory than chemotherapy alone. The former could obviously improve the quality of life of the patients with SCLC.展开更多
文摘目的:系统评价重组改构人肿瘤坏死因子(rmhTNF)对比顺铂胸腔灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效和安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库、中国科技期刊数据库、中国医学生物文献数据库,纳入rmhTNF(试验组)对比顺铂(对照组)胸腔灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液的随机对照试验(RCT),提取资料并按照Cochrane系统评价员手册5.3.0评价质量后,采用RevMan 5.3统计软件对数据进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入7项RCT,合计478例患者。Meta分析结果显示,试验组患者临床总有效率[RR=1.43,95%CI(1.27,1.62),P<0.001]显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义;试验组患者胃肠道反应[RR=1.15,95%CI(0.73,1.80),P=0.55]、胸痛[RR=1.12,95%CI(0.73,1.73),P=0.60]、发热[RR=0.62,95%CI(0.35,1.08),P=0.09]、骨髓抑制[OR=0.94,95%CI(0.57,1.54),P=0.79]发生率与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:rmhTNF胸腔灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液疗效显著优于顺铂,胃肠道反应、胸痛、发热、骨髓抑制等毒副反应的发生率与顺铂相当。
文摘The efficacy and safety of the recombinant mutant human tumor necrosis factor （rmhTNF） combined with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer （SCLC） were evaluated in this study. The selected 37 patients with SCLC were divided into experimental group （n= 18） and control group （n= 19）. Both groups were subjected to EP regimen. While in the experimental group, a regimen of 4 × 10^6 U/m^2 rmhTNF intramuscular injection was given once a day from the 1st to 7th day and 11th to 17th day on the chemotherapy cycle. Twenty-one days were as a chemotherapy cycle and all patients received treatment with 2 cycles. The response rate was 83.3 % （15/18） in the experimental group and 63.2 % （12/19） in the control group respectively （P〈0.05）. The KPS score after treatment was 78. 4±9.6 in the experimental group and 71.2±9.7 in the control group with the difference being significant （P〈0. 05）. No severe adverse effects occurred in the two groups. It was concluded that the curative effectiveness of the rmhTNF combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of SCLC was more satisfactory than chemotherapy alone. The former could obviously improve the quality of life of the patients with SCLC.
