AIM: To investigate the role of perioperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the treatment of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Using preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based...AIM: To investigate the role of perioperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the treatment of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Using preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based staging criteria, 238 patients with ESCC (stage ⅡⅢ ) were enrolled in this prospective study between January 1997 and June 2004. With informed consent, patients were randomized into 3 groups: preoperative CRT (80 cases), postoperative CRT (78 cases) and surgery alone (S) (80 cases). The 1-, 3-, 5and 10-year survival were followed up. Progressionfree survival (PFS) was chosen as the primary endpoint by treatment arm measured from study entry until documented progression of disease or death from any cause. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS) determined as the time (in months) between the date of therapy and the date of death. Other objectives were surgical and adjuvant therapy complications.RESULTS: With median follow-up of 45 mo for all the enrolled patients, significant differences in the 1-, 3-, 5-, 10-year OS (91.3%, 63.5%, 43.5%, 24.5% vs 91%, 62.8%, 42.3%, 24.4% vs 87.5%, 51.3%, 33.8%, 12.5%, P = 0.0176) and PFS (89.3%, 61.3%, 37.5%, 18.1% vs 89.1%, 61.1%, 37.2%, 17.8% vs 84.5%, 49.3%, 25.9%, 6.2%, P = 0.0151) were detected among the 3 arms. There were no significant differences in OS and PFS between the preoperative CRT and postoperative CRT arm (P > 0.05). For the patients who had radical resection, significant differences in median PFS (48 mo vs 61 mo vs 39.5 mo, P = 0.0331) and median OS (56.5 mo vs 72 mo vs 41.5 mo, P = 0.0153) were detected among the 3 arms, but there were no significant differences in OS and PFS between the preoperative CRT and postoperative CRT arm (P > 0.05). The local recurrence rates in the preoperative CRT, postoperative CRT group and S group were 11.3%, 14.1% and 35%, respectively (P < 0.05). No significant differences were detected among the 3 groups when comparing complications but tended to be in favor of the postoperative CRT and S groups (P > 0展开更多
Objective：Radiation therapy combined with surgical excision was considered as one of the most effective treatment plans for keloid lesions.However,there was no unanimity found over present literatures regarding the i...Objective：Radiation therapy combined with surgical excision was considered as one of the most effective treatment plans for keloid lesions.However,there was no unanimity found over present literatures regarding the issue on optimized treatment strategy for keloids.We here provide a comprehensive review over this issue and emphasize on the influencing factors.Data Sources：The data analyzed in this review were searched from articles included in PubMed and EMBASE databases.Study Selection：The original articles and critical reviews discussing the application of radiation therapy in keloids treatment were selected for this review.Results：The application of radiation therapy has transitioned from simple superficial X-ray irradiation to brachytherapy.Furthermore,several factors including radiation type,dose,fraction,interval,and complications were reviewed,and the results revealed that these factors were significant toward clinical outcome at various levels.Conclusions：Both past and present evidence support the idea that combination therapy of radiation and surgical therapy is safe and feasible.However,the optimization of treatment strategy was based on different radiation types and should take dose,fractions,interval,and complications into consideration,which will then decrease the rate of recurrence and increase the level of satisfaction.展开更多
文摘AIM: To investigate the role of perioperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the treatment of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Using preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based staging criteria, 238 patients with ESCC (stage ⅡⅢ ) were enrolled in this prospective study between January 1997 and June 2004. With informed consent, patients were randomized into 3 groups: preoperative CRT (80 cases), postoperative CRT (78 cases) and surgery alone (S) (80 cases). The 1-, 3-, 5and 10-year survival were followed up. Progressionfree survival (PFS) was chosen as the primary endpoint by treatment arm measured from study entry until documented progression of disease or death from any cause. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS) determined as the time (in months) between the date of therapy and the date of death. Other objectives were surgical and adjuvant therapy complications.RESULTS: With median follow-up of 45 mo for all the enrolled patients, significant differences in the 1-, 3-, 5-, 10-year OS (91.3%, 63.5%, 43.5%, 24.5% vs 91%, 62.8%, 42.3%, 24.4% vs 87.5%, 51.3%, 33.8%, 12.5%, P = 0.0176) and PFS (89.3%, 61.3%, 37.5%, 18.1% vs 89.1%, 61.1%, 37.2%, 17.8% vs 84.5%, 49.3%, 25.9%, 6.2%, P = 0.0151) were detected among the 3 arms. There were no significant differences in OS and PFS between the preoperative CRT and postoperative CRT arm (P > 0.05). For the patients who had radical resection, significant differences in median PFS (48 mo vs 61 mo vs 39.5 mo, P = 0.0331) and median OS (56.5 mo vs 72 mo vs 41.5 mo, P = 0.0153) were detected among the 3 arms, but there were no significant differences in OS and PFS between the preoperative CRT and postoperative CRT arm (P > 0.05). The local recurrence rates in the preoperative CRT, postoperative CRT group and S group were 11.3%, 14.1% and 35%, respectively (P < 0.05). No significant differences were detected among the 3 groups when comparing complications but tended to be in favor of the postoperative CRT and S groups (P > 0
文摘Objective：Radiation therapy combined with surgical excision was considered as one of the most effective treatment plans for keloid lesions.However,there was no unanimity found over present literatures regarding the issue on optimized treatment strategy for keloids.We here provide a comprehensive review over this issue and emphasize on the influencing factors.Data Sources：The data analyzed in this review were searched from articles included in PubMed and EMBASE databases.Study Selection：The original articles and critical reviews discussing the application of radiation therapy in keloids treatment were selected for this review.Results：The application of radiation therapy has transitioned from simple superficial X-ray irradiation to brachytherapy.Furthermore,several factors including radiation type,dose,fraction,interval,and complications were reviewed,and the results revealed that these factors were significant toward clinical outcome at various levels.Conclusions：Both past and present evidence support the idea that combination therapy of radiation and surgical therapy is safe and feasible.However,the optimization of treatment strategy was based on different radiation types and should take dose,fractions,interval,and complications into consideration,which will then decrease the rate of recurrence and increase the level of satisfaction.
