目的比较旋前方肌的缝合与否对桡骨远端骨折内固定疗效的中期影响。方法两组独立手术医师组,A组对桡骨远端骨折采用切开复位钢板内固定后,不予以缝合旋前方肌;B组对桡骨远端骨折钢板内固定后,仔细修补缝合旋前方肌;共随机回顾性选取30...目的比较旋前方肌的缝合与否对桡骨远端骨折内固定疗效的中期影响。方法两组独立手术医师组,A组对桡骨远端骨折采用切开复位钢板内固定后,不予以缝合旋前方肌;B组对桡骨远端骨折钢板内固定后,仔细修补缝合旋前方肌;共随机回顾性选取30例患者,15例为一组,均为AO B型骨折。分别在术后4周、6个月比较健侧与患侧的腕关节旋前、旋后功能以及上肢功能评分(disability of arm-shoulder-hand,DASH)。结果术后4周,患侧的旋前旋后功能较健侧有极显著性差异(P<0.01);AB两组患侧组内旋前有显著性差异(P<0.05),旋后无显著性差异(P>0.05);术后6个月,患侧的旋前旋后功能较健侧无显著性差异(P>0.05);AB两组患侧组内旋前以及旋后均无显著性差异(P>0.05);术后4周,AB两组组间DASH评分具有显著性差异(P<0.05);术后6个月,AB两组组间DASH评分无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论旋前方肌对桡骨远端骨折切开复位内固定的中期疗效无明显影响,手术内固定对桡骨远端B型骨折可取得良好的中期疗效。展开更多
Background L-shaped incision of pronator quadratus （PQ） muscle along its radial and distal borders was always taken for distal radius fractures reduction and internal fixation.Repair of the PQ muscle was always reco...Background L-shaped incision of pronator quadratus （PQ） muscle along its radial and distal borders was always taken for distal radius fractures reduction and internal fixation.Repair of the PQ muscle was always recommended at the end of operation for some instructive reasons.But repair of PQ is not satisfied because of poor quality of muscle and fascial tissues which may cause pain or impede forearm pronation and supination for post-operative scarring around PQ.Inserting the locking palmar plate to pass under the pronator quadratus muscle and the locking screws are inserted through miniincisions in pronator quadratus in some patients with distal radius fractures is a reasonable technique which can preserve the pronator quadratus.The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical effects after volar plating of the distal radius fractures while preserving the pronator quadratus and pronator quadratus repair.Methods Between September 2010 and April 2012,65 patients （42 males and 23 females; aged 20-68 years and a mean age of 42.5 years） with distal radius fracture underwent open reduction and internal fixation using the volar locking palmar plates （Depuy or Smith companies）.The patients were classified as 23A-2 through 23C-3 according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association （OTA） classifications.All surgeries were completed by the same trained team.The volar locking palmar plates of distal radius performed with preserving pronator quadratus group involved 30 patients including 19 males and 11 females and performed with pronator quadratus repair group involved 35 patients including 23 males and 12 females.We compared the two groups for wrist pain,forearm range of motion,grip strength,pedoperative complications and wrist functional recovery score.Results The minimum follow-up for the whole cohort was one year.The differences between the two groups were significant with regard to wrist pain,forearm range of motion,grip strength and wrist function at 1,2,and 6 weeks postoperatively,but insi展开更多
目的:探讨桡骨远端骨折改良Henry入路手术治疗中是否缝合旋前方肌对术后前臂功能的影响。方法:自2018年1月至2020年12月采用改良Henry入路切开复位锁定钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折患者220例,按照缝合方法不同分为两组,术中缝合组112例,...目的:探讨桡骨远端骨折改良Henry入路手术治疗中是否缝合旋前方肌对术后前臂功能的影响。方法:自2018年1月至2020年12月采用改良Henry入路切开复位锁定钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折患者220例,按照缝合方法不同分为两组,术中缝合组112例,男35例,女77例;年龄37~65(48.5±7.4)岁;骨折AO分型,B型46例,C型66例;骨折复位锁定钢板固定后将切开旋前方肌予以缝合。不缝合组108例,男32例,女76例;年龄34~67(47.6±7.8)岁;骨折AO分型B型41例,C型67例;骨折复位锁定钢板固定后对切开旋前方肌不予缝合,原位铺于钢板表面。分别于术后6周、6个月比较两组腕关节活动范围(旋前、旋后、掌倾、背伸),肩臂手功能障碍评分量表(disability of arm shoulder and hand,DASH)评分和视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)。结果:220例患者获得随访,时间6~18(8.5±1.3)个月。术后6周,两组腕关节活动范围、DASH评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6周术中缝合组VAS评分(2.6±1.2)分,与不缝合组(5.8±2.3)分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月两组腕关节活动范围、DASH评分、VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:改良Henry入路缝合旋前方肌在术后腕关节活动范围、上肢功能近期无明显优势,但术中缝合旋前方肌能减少早期术后疼痛,建议术中应缝合旋前方肌。展开更多
文摘目的比较旋前方肌的缝合与否对桡骨远端骨折内固定疗效的中期影响。方法两组独立手术医师组,A组对桡骨远端骨折采用切开复位钢板内固定后,不予以缝合旋前方肌;B组对桡骨远端骨折钢板内固定后,仔细修补缝合旋前方肌;共随机回顾性选取30例患者,15例为一组,均为AO B型骨折。分别在术后4周、6个月比较健侧与患侧的腕关节旋前、旋后功能以及上肢功能评分(disability of arm-shoulder-hand,DASH)。结果术后4周,患侧的旋前旋后功能较健侧有极显著性差异(P<0.01);AB两组患侧组内旋前有显著性差异(P<0.05),旋后无显著性差异(P>0.05);术后6个月,患侧的旋前旋后功能较健侧无显著性差异(P>0.05);AB两组患侧组内旋前以及旋后均无显著性差异(P>0.05);术后4周,AB两组组间DASH评分具有显著性差异(P<0.05);术后6个月,AB两组组间DASH评分无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论旋前方肌对桡骨远端骨折切开复位内固定的中期疗效无明显影响,手术内固定对桡骨远端B型骨折可取得良好的中期疗效。
文摘Background L-shaped incision of pronator quadratus （PQ） muscle along its radial and distal borders was always taken for distal radius fractures reduction and internal fixation.Repair of the PQ muscle was always recommended at the end of operation for some instructive reasons.But repair of PQ is not satisfied because of poor quality of muscle and fascial tissues which may cause pain or impede forearm pronation and supination for post-operative scarring around PQ.Inserting the locking palmar plate to pass under the pronator quadratus muscle and the locking screws are inserted through miniincisions in pronator quadratus in some patients with distal radius fractures is a reasonable technique which can preserve the pronator quadratus.The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical effects after volar plating of the distal radius fractures while preserving the pronator quadratus and pronator quadratus repair.Methods Between September 2010 and April 2012,65 patients （42 males and 23 females; aged 20-68 years and a mean age of 42.5 years） with distal radius fracture underwent open reduction and internal fixation using the volar locking palmar plates （Depuy or Smith companies）.The patients were classified as 23A-2 through 23C-3 according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association （OTA） classifications.All surgeries were completed by the same trained team.The volar locking palmar plates of distal radius performed with preserving pronator quadratus group involved 30 patients including 19 males and 11 females and performed with pronator quadratus repair group involved 35 patients including 23 males and 12 females.We compared the two groups for wrist pain,forearm range of motion,grip strength,pedoperative complications and wrist functional recovery score.Results The minimum follow-up for the whole cohort was one year.The differences between the two groups were significant with regard to wrist pain,forearm range of motion,grip strength and wrist function at 1,2,and 6 weeks postoperatively,but insi
文摘目的:探讨桡骨远端骨折改良Henry入路手术治疗中是否缝合旋前方肌对术后前臂功能的影响。方法:自2018年1月至2020年12月采用改良Henry入路切开复位锁定钢板内固定治疗桡骨远端骨折患者220例,按照缝合方法不同分为两组,术中缝合组112例,男35例,女77例;年龄37~65(48.5±7.4)岁;骨折AO分型,B型46例,C型66例;骨折复位锁定钢板固定后将切开旋前方肌予以缝合。不缝合组108例,男32例,女76例;年龄34~67(47.6±7.8)岁;骨折AO分型B型41例,C型67例;骨折复位锁定钢板固定后对切开旋前方肌不予缝合,原位铺于钢板表面。分别于术后6周、6个月比较两组腕关节活动范围(旋前、旋后、掌倾、背伸),肩臂手功能障碍评分量表(disability of arm shoulder and hand,DASH)评分和视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)。结果:220例患者获得随访,时间6~18(8.5±1.3)个月。术后6周,两组腕关节活动范围、DASH评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6周术中缝合组VAS评分(2.6±1.2)分,与不缝合组(5.8±2.3)分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月两组腕关节活动范围、DASH评分、VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:改良Henry入路缝合旋前方肌在术后腕关节活动范围、上肢功能近期无明显优势,但术中缝合旋前方肌能减少早期术后疼痛,建议术中应缝合旋前方肌。
