Background L-shaped incision of pronator quadratus （PQ） muscle along its radial and distal borders was always taken for distal radius fractures reduction and internal fixation.Repair of the PQ muscle was always reco...Background L-shaped incision of pronator quadratus （PQ） muscle along its radial and distal borders was always taken for distal radius fractures reduction and internal fixation.Repair of the PQ muscle was always recommended at the end of operation for some instructive reasons.But repair of PQ is not satisfied because of poor quality of muscle and fascial tissues which may cause pain or impede forearm pronation and supination for post-operative scarring around PQ.Inserting the locking palmar plate to pass under the pronator quadratus muscle and the locking screws are inserted through miniincisions in pronator quadratus in some patients with distal radius fractures is a reasonable technique which can preserve the pronator quadratus.The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical effects after volar plating of the distal radius fractures while preserving the pronator quadratus and pronator quadratus repair.Methods Between September 2010 and April 2012,65 patients （42 males and 23 females; aged 20-68 years and a mean age of 42.5 years） with distal radius fracture underwent open reduction and internal fixation using the volar locking palmar plates （Depuy or Smith companies）.The patients were classified as 23A-2 through 23C-3 according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association （OTA） classifications.All surgeries were completed by the same trained team.The volar locking palmar plates of distal radius performed with preserving pronator quadratus group involved 30 patients including 19 males and 11 females and performed with pronator quadratus repair group involved 35 patients including 23 males and 12 females.We compared the two groups for wrist pain,forearm range of motion,grip strength,pedoperative complications and wrist functional recovery score.Results The minimum follow-up for the whole cohort was one year.The differences between the two groups were significant with regard to wrist pain,forearm range of motion,grip strength and wrist function at 1,2,and 6 weeks postoperatively,but insi展开更多
文摘Background L-shaped incision of pronator quadratus （PQ） muscle along its radial and distal borders was always taken for distal radius fractures reduction and internal fixation.Repair of the PQ muscle was always recommended at the end of operation for some instructive reasons.But repair of PQ is not satisfied because of poor quality of muscle and fascial tissues which may cause pain or impede forearm pronation and supination for post-operative scarring around PQ.Inserting the locking palmar plate to pass under the pronator quadratus muscle and the locking screws are inserted through miniincisions in pronator quadratus in some patients with distal radius fractures is a reasonable technique which can preserve the pronator quadratus.The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical effects after volar plating of the distal radius fractures while preserving the pronator quadratus and pronator quadratus repair.Methods Between September 2010 and April 2012,65 patients （42 males and 23 females; aged 20-68 years and a mean age of 42.5 years） with distal radius fracture underwent open reduction and internal fixation using the volar locking palmar plates （Depuy or Smith companies）.The patients were classified as 23A-2 through 23C-3 according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association （OTA） classifications.All surgeries were completed by the same trained team.The volar locking palmar plates of distal radius performed with preserving pronator quadratus group involved 30 patients including 19 males and 11 females and performed with pronator quadratus repair group involved 35 patients including 23 males and 12 females.We compared the two groups for wrist pain,forearm range of motion,grip strength,pedoperative complications and wrist functional recovery score.Results The minimum follow-up for the whole cohort was one year.The differences between the two groups were significant with regard to wrist pain,forearm range of motion,grip strength and wrist function at 1,2,and 6 weeks postoperatively,but insi
