Neonatal thrombocytopenia accounts for 20% of neonates hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at DPH. The etiologies are multiple, but bacterial infection is the third leading cause of neonatal mortal...Neonatal thrombocytopenia accounts for 20% of neonates hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at DPH. The etiologies are multiple, but bacterial infection is the third leading cause of neonatal mortality worldwide. We therefore set out to assess the frequency of neonatal thrombocytopenia associated or not with bacterial infection in the NICU. We conducted a retrospective and prospective study with the DPH NICU, over 10 months (August 2018 and April 2019). Thrombocytopenia encountered in the NICUs, were the subject of research into bacteriological, inflammatory, and epidemiological parameters using Inlog laboratory data processing software. During this period, 1280 babies were hospitalized, 94 of whom underwent thrombocytopenia, corresponding to 7.34%, with a sex ratio of 0.92. The number of babies presenting with thrombocytopenia during the first week of hospitalization was 72, accounting for 76.6%. The clinical context was usually low birth weight in 30.8% of cases and perinatal asphyxia (25%). Thrombocytopenia ranged from 2000 to 137,000 with an average of 69,520/mm3. Among these thrombocytopenias, 64 cases (68%) were below 100,000 mm3 and 44 cases had a CRP >5 mg/l. A total of 30 bacteria were isolated, including 23 Enterobacteria, 2 Streptococci, and 1 Acinetobacter. Among these enterobacteria, 14 were multidrug-resistant (MDR). Thrombocytopenia associated with a multidrug-resistant bacterial infection is a real challenging management.展开更多
目的比较婴幼儿血小板减少症患者输注机采血小板和手工分离血小板的疗效。方法纳入2015年1月—2017年12月在本院新生儿重症监护室(NICU)及儿科重症监护室(PICU)行血小板输注治疗且年龄<0.5岁的血小板减少(症)患儿共164人,按输注血小...目的比较婴幼儿血小板减少症患者输注机采血小板和手工分离血小板的疗效。方法纳入2015年1月—2017年12月在本院新生儿重症监护室(NICU)及儿科重症监护室(PICU)行血小板输注治疗且年龄<0.5岁的血小板减少(症)患儿共164人,按输注血小板的种类分为输注手工分离血小板输组(简称手工组)(n=69),输注机采血小板组(简称机采组)(n=95),2组患儿性别、年龄相似(P>0.05);比较2组的血小板输注量、输后1和24 h血小板计数(Plt)、输血反应发生情况,以及血小板计数增高指数(CCI)和血小板回收率(PPR);分析这2种血小板制剂在临床重症患儿中的应用现状。结果机采组与手工组比较,输注前、输注后1和24 h平均Plt(×10~9/L)分别为:132±93 vs 81±72, 210±127vs 134±104和160±99 vs 118±90(P<0.05);1和24 h CCI分别为:33.8±33.8 vs 25.3±35.2、19.2±25.3 vs 22.2±34.6(P>0.05);1和24 h PPR(%)分别为:40.9±39.9 vs 35.1±51.5、22.2±29.7 vs 30.9±50.3(P>0.05)。而且2组1和24 h的CCI和PPR测定有效率(73.7%vs 62.3%,66.3%vs 52.2%和55.8%vs 59.4%,45.3%vs 40.6%)相近(P>0.05)。同时2组入选患儿输注血小板后临床观察均无输血反应发生。结论手工血小板和机采血小板治疗婴幼儿血小板减少症的疗效相近;临床可结合患儿实际情况合理选择使用这2种血小板制剂。展开更多
文摘Neonatal thrombocytopenia accounts for 20% of neonates hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at DPH. The etiologies are multiple, but bacterial infection is the third leading cause of neonatal mortality worldwide. We therefore set out to assess the frequency of neonatal thrombocytopenia associated or not with bacterial infection in the NICU. We conducted a retrospective and prospective study with the DPH NICU, over 10 months (August 2018 and April 2019). Thrombocytopenia encountered in the NICUs, were the subject of research into bacteriological, inflammatory, and epidemiological parameters using Inlog laboratory data processing software. During this period, 1280 babies were hospitalized, 94 of whom underwent thrombocytopenia, corresponding to 7.34%, with a sex ratio of 0.92. The number of babies presenting with thrombocytopenia during the first week of hospitalization was 72, accounting for 76.6%. The clinical context was usually low birth weight in 30.8% of cases and perinatal asphyxia (25%). Thrombocytopenia ranged from 2000 to 137,000 with an average of 69,520/mm3. Among these thrombocytopenias, 64 cases (68%) were below 100,000 mm3 and 44 cases had a CRP >5 mg/l. A total of 30 bacteria were isolated, including 23 Enterobacteria, 2 Streptococci, and 1 Acinetobacter. Among these enterobacteria, 14 were multidrug-resistant (MDR). Thrombocytopenia associated with a multidrug-resistant bacterial infection is a real challenging management.
文摘目的比较婴幼儿血小板减少症患者输注机采血小板和手工分离血小板的疗效。方法纳入2015年1月—2017年12月在本院新生儿重症监护室(NICU)及儿科重症监护室(PICU)行血小板输注治疗且年龄<0.5岁的血小板减少(症)患儿共164人,按输注血小板的种类分为输注手工分离血小板输组(简称手工组)(n=69),输注机采血小板组(简称机采组)(n=95),2组患儿性别、年龄相似(P>0.05);比较2组的血小板输注量、输后1和24 h血小板计数(Plt)、输血反应发生情况,以及血小板计数增高指数(CCI)和血小板回收率(PPR);分析这2种血小板制剂在临床重症患儿中的应用现状。结果机采组与手工组比较,输注前、输注后1和24 h平均Plt(×10~9/L)分别为:132±93 vs 81±72, 210±127vs 134±104和160±99 vs 118±90(P<0.05);1和24 h CCI分别为:33.8±33.8 vs 25.3±35.2、19.2±25.3 vs 22.2±34.6(P>0.05);1和24 h PPR(%)分别为:40.9±39.9 vs 35.1±51.5、22.2±29.7 vs 30.9±50.3(P>0.05)。而且2组1和24 h的CCI和PPR测定有效率(73.7%vs 62.3%,66.3%vs 52.2%和55.8%vs 59.4%,45.3%vs 40.6%)相近(P>0.05)。同时2组入选患儿输注血小板后临床观察均无输血反应发生。结论手工血小板和机采血小板治疗婴幼儿血小板减少症的疗效相近;临床可结合患儿实际情况合理选择使用这2种血小板制剂。
