Current research on common musculoskeletal problems, including osteoart]cular cona]t]ons, tendinopathies, and muscle injuries, focuses on regenerative translational medicine. Platelet-rich plasma therapies have emerge...Current research on common musculoskeletal problems, including osteoart]cular cona]t]ons, tendinopathies, and muscle injuries, focuses on regenerative translational medicine. Platelet-rich plasma therapies have emerged as a potential approach to enhance tissue repair and regeneration. Platelet-rich plasma application aims to provide supraphysiological concentrations of platelets and optionally leukocytes at injured/pathological tissues mimicking the initial stages of healing. However, the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma is controversial in chronic diseases because patients＇ outcomes show partial improvements. Platelet-rich plasma can be customized to specific conditions by selecting the most appropriate formulation and timing for application or by combining platelet-rich plasma with synergistic or complementary treatments. To achieve this goal, researchers should identify and enhance the main mechanisms of healing. In this review, the interactions between platelet-rich plasma and healing mechanisms were addressed and research opportunities for customized treatment modalities were outlined. The development of combinational platelet-rieh plasma treatments that can be used safely and effectively to manipulate healing mechanisms would be valuable and would provide insights into the processes involved in physiological healing and pathological failure.展开更多
Introduction: Mechanical or physical restraint is an exceptional therapeutic resource to immobilize a subject and thus guarantee the safety of the patient and/or third parties in the face of high-risk behaviors, but i...Introduction: Mechanical or physical restraint is an exceptional therapeutic resource to immobilize a subject and thus guarantee the safety of the patient and/or third parties in the face of high-risk behaviors, but it entails multiple crossings (bioethical, philosophical, medical, psychological, legal). Framed in the so-called “safety culture” developed by the WHO, based on the Protocol for its implementation of the CABA and attentive to its frequent use in CABA by different hospital services (medical clinic, geriatrics, intensive care and medical guards) we consider it necessary its study in terms of compliance with the risks it entails and its management. Objectives: Identify regulatory compliance with the GCABA Mechanical restraint (MR) Protocol from a patient safety perspective, as well as describe the clinical and medicolegal aspects, and propose the usefulness of a tool for its management and control. Methodology: Observational, descriptive, transversal and prospective work through the analysis of Clinical Records with indication of MR using a rubric-type form. 177 cases were analyzed between September-November 2023 from three hospitals of the Government of the City of Buenos Aires, statistical parameters were applied and graphs were made. Results: Only 12.99% complied with the Protocol. In the mental health specialized hospital compliance was almost 5 times greater than in the general one, and in the emergency services compliance was 12 times greater than in Inpatient services. We found that the start or end time of MR was not recorded and only 43% described the causes/justifications for the indication (mostly in Emergency and Specialized hospitals), with the MR average time being shorter in Emergency. Conclusions: Only 1.3 out of 10 patients reliably completed the Protocol and it was mostly in the mental health specialized hospital and the emergency services. The results show non-compliance behavior in the application and management of the risk that the use of mechanical restraints entails, being cau展开更多
AIM:To compare the feature of ocular trauma between normalized period and the COVID-19 epidemic period in China,and to provide a profile for eye injuries in special times in future.METHODS:This is a multi-center cross...AIM:To compare the feature of ocular trauma between normalized period and the COVID-19 epidemic period in China,and to provide a profile for eye injuries in special times in future.METHODS:This is a multi-center cross-sectional study with 30 participated hospitals involving the China Ocular Trauma Society members.All hospitalized cases who visited the Ophthalmology Department in participated hospitals with eye injuries during the normalized period(2019)and the COVID-19 epidemic period(2020)were included in this study.Demographic characteristic of cases,date of injury,sites and types of injury were collected.RESULTS:This study involved 13525(61 cases with both eyes)injured cases.There were 7269(53.74%)eyeinjured cases and 6256(46.26%)eye-injured cases in 2019 and 2020 separately.Compared with 2019,the incidence of ocular trauma in retirees,housewives and unemployed increased with year-on-year of 4.96%,102.67%,and 11.64%among all occupations.In 2020,the incidence of eye injuries decreased in all injury sites except for an increase in home(30.29%year-on-year).The incidence of mechanical eye injuries decreased,while that of nonmechanical eye injuries(chemical/thermal/radiation)increased(47.45%year-on-year).There were 255(3.51%,255/7269)and 376(6.01%,376/6256)non-mechanical injured cases in 2019 and 2020(Pearson Chi^(2)=47.33,P<0.001)separately.CONCLUSION:During the COVID-19 epidemic period,the total cases of ocular trauma decrease but the proportion of non-mechanical ocular trauma increase.Penetrating is still the highest proportion among all types of mechanical ocular trauma.From a preventive point of view,protection for retired persons,housewives and unemployed persons should be improved during public health events period.展开更多
<strong>Purpose of Review:</strong> The management of eye injuries is both difficult and argumentative. This study attempts to highlight the management of ocular trauma using currently available informatio...<strong>Purpose of Review:</strong> The management of eye injuries is both difficult and argumentative. This study attempts to highlight the management of ocular trauma using currently available information in the literature and author experience. This review presents a workable framework from the first presentation, epidemiology, classification, investigations, management principles, complications, prognostic factors, final visual outcome and management debates. <strong>Review Findings:</strong> Mechanical ocular trauma is a leading cause of monocular blindness and possible handicap worldwide. Among several classification systems, the most widely accepted is Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT). Mechanical ocular trauma is a topic of unsolved controversy. Patching for corneal abrasion, paracentesis for hyphema, the timing of cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation are all issues in anterior segment injuries. Regarding posterior segment controversies, the timing of vitrectomy, use of prophylactic cryotherapy, the necessity of intravitreal antibiotics in the absence of infection, the use of vitrectomy vs vitreous tap in traumatic endophthalmitis is the issues. The pediatric age group needs to be approached by a different protocol due to the risk of amblyopia, intraocular inflammation, and significant vitreoretinal adhesions. The various prognostic factors have a role in the final visual outcome. B scan is used to exclude R.D, Intraocular foreign body (IOFB), and vitreous haemorrhage in hazy media. Individual surgical strategies are used for every patient according to the classification and extent of the injuries. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> This article examines relevant evidence on the management challenges and controversies of mechanical trauma of the eye and offers treatment recommendations based on published research and the authors’ own experience.展开更多
文摘Current research on common musculoskeletal problems, including osteoart]cular cona]t]ons, tendinopathies, and muscle injuries, focuses on regenerative translational medicine. Platelet-rich plasma therapies have emerged as a potential approach to enhance tissue repair and regeneration. Platelet-rich plasma application aims to provide supraphysiological concentrations of platelets and optionally leukocytes at injured/pathological tissues mimicking the initial stages of healing. However, the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma is controversial in chronic diseases because patients＇ outcomes show partial improvements. Platelet-rich plasma can be customized to specific conditions by selecting the most appropriate formulation and timing for application or by combining platelet-rich plasma with synergistic or complementary treatments. To achieve this goal, researchers should identify and enhance the main mechanisms of healing. In this review, the interactions between platelet-rich plasma and healing mechanisms were addressed and research opportunities for customized treatment modalities were outlined. The development of combinational platelet-rieh plasma treatments that can be used safely and effectively to manipulate healing mechanisms would be valuable and would provide insights into the processes involved in physiological healing and pathological failure.
文摘Introduction: Mechanical or physical restraint is an exceptional therapeutic resource to immobilize a subject and thus guarantee the safety of the patient and/or third parties in the face of high-risk behaviors, but it entails multiple crossings (bioethical, philosophical, medical, psychological, legal). Framed in the so-called “safety culture” developed by the WHO, based on the Protocol for its implementation of the CABA and attentive to its frequent use in CABA by different hospital services (medical clinic, geriatrics, intensive care and medical guards) we consider it necessary its study in terms of compliance with the risks it entails and its management. Objectives: Identify regulatory compliance with the GCABA Mechanical restraint (MR) Protocol from a patient safety perspective, as well as describe the clinical and medicolegal aspects, and propose the usefulness of a tool for its management and control. Methodology: Observational, descriptive, transversal and prospective work through the analysis of Clinical Records with indication of MR using a rubric-type form. 177 cases were analyzed between September-November 2023 from three hospitals of the Government of the City of Buenos Aires, statistical parameters were applied and graphs were made. Results: Only 12.99% complied with the Protocol. In the mental health specialized hospital compliance was almost 5 times greater than in the general one, and in the emergency services compliance was 12 times greater than in Inpatient services. We found that the start or end time of MR was not recorded and only 43% described the causes/justifications for the indication (mostly in Emergency and Specialized hospitals), with the MR average time being shorter in Emergency. Conclusions: Only 1.3 out of 10 patients reliably completed the Protocol and it was mostly in the mental health specialized hospital and the emergency services. The results show non-compliance behavior in the application and management of the risk that the use of mechanical restraints entails, being cau
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.82020108007,No.81830026)Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Special Project(No.20JCZXJC00180)。
文摘AIM:To compare the feature of ocular trauma between normalized period and the COVID-19 epidemic period in China,and to provide a profile for eye injuries in special times in future.METHODS:This is a multi-center cross-sectional study with 30 participated hospitals involving the China Ocular Trauma Society members.All hospitalized cases who visited the Ophthalmology Department in participated hospitals with eye injuries during the normalized period(2019)and the COVID-19 epidemic period(2020)were included in this study.Demographic characteristic of cases,date of injury,sites and types of injury were collected.RESULTS:This study involved 13525(61 cases with both eyes)injured cases.There were 7269(53.74%)eyeinjured cases and 6256(46.26%)eye-injured cases in 2019 and 2020 separately.Compared with 2019,the incidence of ocular trauma in retirees,housewives and unemployed increased with year-on-year of 4.96%,102.67%,and 11.64%among all occupations.In 2020,the incidence of eye injuries decreased in all injury sites except for an increase in home(30.29%year-on-year).The incidence of mechanical eye injuries decreased,while that of nonmechanical eye injuries(chemical/thermal/radiation)increased(47.45%year-on-year).There were 255(3.51%,255/7269)and 376(6.01%,376/6256)non-mechanical injured cases in 2019 and 2020(Pearson Chi^(2)=47.33,P<0.001)separately.CONCLUSION:During the COVID-19 epidemic period,the total cases of ocular trauma decrease but the proportion of non-mechanical ocular trauma increase.Penetrating is still the highest proportion among all types of mechanical ocular trauma.From a preventive point of view,protection for retired persons,housewives and unemployed persons should be improved during public health events period.
文摘<strong>Purpose of Review:</strong> The management of eye injuries is both difficult and argumentative. This study attempts to highlight the management of ocular trauma using currently available information in the literature and author experience. This review presents a workable framework from the first presentation, epidemiology, classification, investigations, management principles, complications, prognostic factors, final visual outcome and management debates. <strong>Review Findings:</strong> Mechanical ocular trauma is a leading cause of monocular blindness and possible handicap worldwide. Among several classification systems, the most widely accepted is Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT). Mechanical ocular trauma is a topic of unsolved controversy. Patching for corneal abrasion, paracentesis for hyphema, the timing of cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation are all issues in anterior segment injuries. Regarding posterior segment controversies, the timing of vitrectomy, use of prophylactic cryotherapy, the necessity of intravitreal antibiotics in the absence of infection, the use of vitrectomy vs vitreous tap in traumatic endophthalmitis is the issues. The pediatric age group needs to be approached by a different protocol due to the risk of amblyopia, intraocular inflammation, and significant vitreoretinal adhesions. The various prognostic factors have a role in the final visual outcome. B scan is used to exclude R.D, Intraocular foreign body (IOFB), and vitreous haemorrhage in hazy media. Individual surgical strategies are used for every patient according to the classification and extent of the injuries. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> This article examines relevant evidence on the management challenges and controversies of mechanical trauma of the eye and offers treatment recommendations based on published research and the authors’ own experience.
